TSTP Solution File: SWV372+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV372+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 3.24s 3.43s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SWV372+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 15:03:10 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.39  Tue Jun 14 15:03:10 2022
% 0.15/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 16048.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [copy,78,flip.1] {-} insert_pq(insert_pq(A,B),C)=insert_pq(insert_pq(A,C),B).
% 0.15/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 106 during input processing: 0 [copy,106,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 89 during input processing: 0 [copy,107,flip.1] {-} insert_cpq(triple(A,B,C),D)=triple(insert_pqp(A,D),insert_slb(B,pair(D,bottom)),C).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.48  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.48  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.48  number of clauses in intial UL: 67
% 0.21/0.48  number of clauses initially in problem: 105
% 0.21/0.48  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 63
% 0.21/0.48  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.21/0.48  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.48  absolute distinct symbol count: 53
% 0.21/0.48     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.21/0.48     distinct function count: 26
% 0.21/0.48     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.88/1.13  
% 0.88/1.13  
% 0.88/1.13  Changing weight limit from 60 to 44.
% 0.88/1.13  
% 0.88/1.13  Resetting weight limit to 44 after 120 givens.
% 0.88/1.13  
% 1.02/1.23  
% 1.02/1.23  
% 1.02/1.23  Changing weight limit from 44 to 40.
% 1.02/1.23  
% 1.02/1.23  Resetting weight limit to 40 after 125 givens.
% 1.02/1.23  
% 1.05/1.32  
% 1.05/1.32  
% 1.05/1.32  Changing weight limit from 40 to 38.
% 1.05/1.32  
% 1.05/1.32  Resetting weight limit to 38 after 130 givens.
% 1.05/1.32  
% 1.20/1.42  
% 1.20/1.42  
% 1.20/1.42  Changing weight limit from 38 to 35.
% 1.20/1.42  
% 1.20/1.42  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 135 givens.
% 1.20/1.42  
% 1.27/1.50  
% 1.27/1.50  
% 1.27/1.50  Changing weight limit from 35 to 33.
% 1.27/1.50  
% 1.27/1.50  Resetting weight limit to 33 after 140 givens.
% 1.27/1.50  
% 1.35/1.59  
% 1.35/1.59  
% 1.35/1.59  Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 1.35/1.59  
% 1.35/1.59  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 145 givens.
% 1.35/1.59  
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 150 givens.
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.50/1.74  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.50/1.74  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 155 givens.
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.63/1.83  
% 1.63/1.83  
% 1.63/1.83  Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 1.63/1.83  
% 1.63/1.83  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 160 givens.
% 1.63/1.83  
% 1.72/1.91  
% 1.72/1.91  
% 1.72/1.91  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.72/1.91  
% 1.72/1.91  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 165 givens.
% 1.72/1.91  
% 1.78/1.99  
% 1.78/1.99  
% 1.78/1.99  Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 1.78/1.99  
% 1.78/1.99  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 170 givens.
% 1.78/1.99  
% 1.86/2.06  
% 1.86/2.06  
% 1.86/2.06  Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.86/2.06  
% 1.86/2.06  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 175 givens.
% 1.86/2.06  
% 2.09/2.34  
% 2.09/2.34  
% 2.09/2.34  Changing weight limit from 25 to 22.
% 2.09/2.34  
% 2.09/2.34  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 185 givens.
% 2.09/2.34  
% 2.24/2.50  
% 2.24/2.50  
% 2.24/2.50  Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 2.24/2.50  
% 2.24/2.50  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 190 givens.
% 2.24/2.50  
% 2.39/2.65  
% 2.39/2.65  
% 2.39/2.65  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 2.39/2.65  
% 2.39/2.65  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 205 givens.
% 2.39/2.65  
% 2.54/2.76  
% 2.54/2.76  
% 2.54/2.76  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 2.54/2.76  
% 2.54/2.76  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 215 givens.
% 2.54/2.76  
% 2.70/2.97  
% 2.70/2.97  
% 2.70/2.97  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 2.70/2.97  
% 2.70/2.97  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 225 givens.
% 2.70/2.97  
% 2.81/3.00  
% 2.81/3.00  
% 2.81/3.00  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 2.81/3.00  
% 2.81/3.00  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 230 givens.
% 2.81/3.00  
% 3.00/3.21  
% 3.00/3.21  
% 3.00/3.21  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 3.00/3.21  
% 3.00/3.21  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 270 givens.
% 3.00/3.21  
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 3.24/3.43  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 3.24/3.43  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 3.24/3.43  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 3.24/3.43  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 3.24/3.43  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 3.24/3.43  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  
% 3.24/3.43  The job finished Tue Jun 14 15:03:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------