TSTP Solution File: SWV372+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV372+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:57:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (  29   ~;  19   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   5 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (  13 sgn;  59   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l8_co,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
     => contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',l8_co) ).

fof(ax40,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ok(triple(X1,X2,bad))
    <=> ~ $true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',ax40) ).

fof(l8_lX,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ~ phi(triple(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',l8_lX) ).

fof(ax51,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( X2 != create_slb
     => findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = findmin_pqp_res(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',ax51) ).

fof(ax47,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( X2 != create_slb
        & ~ contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)) )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',ax47) ).

fof(l8_li56,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)
    <=> contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',l8_li56) ).

fof(ax39,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)
    <=> contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',ax39) ).

fof(ax46,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = triple(X1,create_slb,bad),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p',ax46) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
       => contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l8_co]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax40]) ).

fof(c_0_10,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ~ phi(triple(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l8_lX]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    & ~ contains_pq(i(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X30,X31,X32] :
      ( X31 = create_slb
      | findmin_cpq_res(triple(X30,X31,X32)) = findmin_pqp_res(X30) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax51])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] : ~ ok(triple(X37,X38,bad)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,lemma,
    ! [X59,X60,X61] :
      ( ok(triple(X59,X60,X61))
      | ~ phi(triple(X59,X60,X61)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( X2 != create_slb
        & ~ contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)) )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax47]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ contains_pq(i(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = create_slb
    | findmin_cpq_res(triple(X2,X1,X3)) = findmin_pqp_res(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_18,lemma,
    ! [X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X24,X25,X26),X27)
        | contains_pq(i(triple(X24,X25,X26)),X27) )
      & ( ~ contains_pq(i(triple(X24,X25,X26)),X27)
        | contains_cpq(triple(X24,X25,X26),X27) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l8_li56])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
    ( ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ phi(triple(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X64,X65,X66] :
      ( X65 = create_slb
      | contains_slb(X65,findmin_pqp_res(X64))
      | findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X64,X65,X66)) = triple(X64,update_slb(X65,findmin_pqp_res(X64)),bad) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = create_slb
    | ~ contains_pq(i(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
    ( contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)
    | ~ contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X112,X113,X114,X115] :
      ( ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X112,X113,X114),X115)
        | contains_slb(X113,X115) )
      & ( ~ contains_slb(X113,X115)
        | contains_cpq(triple(X112,X113,X114),X115) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    ~ phi(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = create_slb
    | contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3)) = triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = create_slb
    | ~ contains_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( contains_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)
    | ~ contains_slb(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
    ( X1 = create_slb
    | contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | ~ phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    phi(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = create_slb
    | ~ contains_slb(esk2_0,findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X46,X47] : findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X46,create_slb,X47)) = triple(X46,create_slb,bad),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax46]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = create_slb,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = triple(X1,create_slb,bad),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SWV372+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:01:14 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N20radR3dl/E---3.1_25676.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # sh5l with pid 25775 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 25778 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 66
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 11
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 233
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 22
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 210
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 285
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 251
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 281
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 41
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 130
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 24
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 82
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 165
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 500
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 78
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2619
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2237
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 14
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 344
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8699
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2096 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------