TSTP Solution File: SWV369+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV369+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:16:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 12 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 10 sgn 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l5_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2),X3)
<=> contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l5_co) ).
fof(ax54,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax54) ).
fof(ax8,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+1.ax',ax8) ).
fof(ax39,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)
<=> contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax39) ).
fof(ax20,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax20) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2),X3)
<=> contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l5_co]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0),esk7_0)
| ~ contains_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0)),esk7_0) )
& ( contains_cpq(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0),esk7_0)
| contains_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0)),esk7_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] : i(triple(X3,create_slb,X4)) = create_pq,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax54]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax8])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X5,X6,X7),X8)
| contains_slb(X6,X8) )
& ( ~ contains_slb(X6,X8)
| contains_cpq(triple(X5,X6,X7),X8) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax39])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( contains_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0)),esk7_0)
| contains_cpq(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0),esk7_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ contains_pq(create_pq,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X2] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( contains_slb(X1,X2)
| ~ contains_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
contains_cpq(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0),esk7_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
~ contains_slb(create_slb,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWV369+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 22:02:59 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 63
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 87
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 87
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 184
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 161
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 179
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 82
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 59
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 160
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 454
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 812
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 674
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7643
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 3384 pages
% 0.27/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------