TSTP Solution File: SWV369+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWV369+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.56s 2.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   60
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   69 (   9 unt;  55 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   6   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   76 (  45   >;  31   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  19 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   36 (  36 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (;  19   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ pair_in_list > succ_cpq > strictly_less_than > pi_sharp_removemin > pi_sharp_remove > pi_sharp_find_min > pi_remove > less_than > issmallestelement_pq > contains_slb > contains_pq > contains_cpq > pi_removemin > pi_find_min > phi > ok > isnonempty_slb > isnonempty_pq > check_cpq > triple > update_slb > removemin_pq_res > removemin_pq_eff > remove_slb > remove_pqp > remove_pq > remove_cpq > pair > lookup_slb > insert_slb > insert_pqp > insert_pq > insert_cpq > findmin_pq_res > findmin_pq_eff > #nlpp > removemin_cpq_res > removemin_cpq_eff > i > findmin_pqp_res > findmin_cpq_res > findmin_cpq_eff > create_slb > create_pq > bottom > bad > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(bad,type,
    bad: $i ).

tff(insert_cpq,type,
    insert_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_sharp_find_min,type,
    pi_sharp_find_min: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pi_remove,type,
    pi_remove: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(succ_cpq,type,
    succ_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(insert_pq,type,
    insert_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_find_min,type,
    pi_find_min: $i > $o ).

tff(i,type,
    i: $i > $i ).

tff(remove_cpq,type,
    remove_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_sharp_removemin,type,
    pi_sharp_removemin: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pi_sharp_remove,type,
    pi_sharp_remove: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(contains_slb,type,
    contains_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(contains_pq,type,
    contains_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(findmin_pq_eff,type,
    findmin_pq_eff: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(lookup_slb,type,
    lookup_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_removemin,type,
    pi_removemin: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(phi,type,
    phi: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(pair_in_list,type,
    pair_in_list: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(isnonempty_pq,type,
    isnonempty_pq: $i > $o ).

tff(findmin_pq_res,type,
    findmin_pq_res: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(less_than,type,
    less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff(issmallestelement_pq,type,
    issmallestelement_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(contains_cpq,type,
    contains_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(strictly_less_than,type,
    strictly_less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pair,type,
    pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ok,type,
    ok: $i > $o ).

tff(insert_pqp,type,
    insert_pqp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff(remove_pq,type,
    remove_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_pqp_res,type,
    findmin_pqp_res: $i > $i ).

tff(remove_pqp,type,
    remove_pqp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(bottom,type,
    bottom: $i ).

tff(removemin_pq_res,type,
    removemin_pq_res: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff(triple,type,
    triple: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(create_pq,type,
    create_pq: $i ).

tff(removemin_cpq_res,type,
    removemin_cpq_res: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff(isnonempty_slb,type,
    isnonempty_slb: $i > $o ).

tff(check_cpq,type,
    check_cpq: $i > $o ).

tff(remove_slb,type,
    remove_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_cpq_eff,type,
    findmin_cpq_eff: $i > $i ).

tff(removemin_cpq_eff,type,
    removemin_cpq_eff: $i > $i ).

tff(create_slb,type,
    create_slb: $i ).

tff(removemin_pq_eff,type,
    removemin_pq_eff: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_cpq_res,type,
    findmin_cpq_res: $i > $i ).

tff(insert_slb,type,
    insert_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(update_slb,type,
    update_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_185,axiom,
    ! [U] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,U),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax20) ).

tff(f_104,axiom,
    ! [U] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,U),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+1.ax',ax8) ).

tff(f_389,axiom,
    ! [U,V] : ( i(triple(U,create_slb,V)) = create_pq ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax54) ).

tff(f_442,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U,V,W] :
        ( contains_cpq(triple(U,create_slb,V),W)
      <=> contains_pq(i(triple(U,create_slb,V)),W) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l5_co) ).

tff(f_295,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( contains_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X)
    <=> contains_slb(V,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax39) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [U_40] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,U_40),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_185]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [U_12] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,U_12),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_104]) ).

tff(c_134,plain,
    ! [U_145,V_146] : ( i(triple(U_145,create_slb,V_146)) = create_pq ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_389]) ).

tff(c_180,plain,
    ( contains_pq(i(triple('#skF_5',create_slb,'#skF_6')),'#skF_7')
    | contains_cpq(triple('#skF_8',create_slb,'#skF_9'),'#skF_10') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_442]) ).

tff(c_183,plain,
    ( contains_pq(create_pq,'#skF_7')
    | contains_cpq(triple('#skF_8',create_slb,'#skF_9'),'#skF_10') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_134,c_180]) ).

tff(c_185,plain,
    contains_cpq(triple('#skF_8',create_slb,'#skF_9'),'#skF_10'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_183]) ).

tff(c_641,plain,
    ! [V_313,X_314,U_315,W_316] :
      ( contains_slb(V_313,X_314)
      | ~ contains_cpq(triple(U_315,V_313,W_316),X_314) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_295]) ).

tff(c_647,plain,
    contains_slb(create_slb,'#skF_10'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_185,c_641]) ).

tff(c_652,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_647]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWV369+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:19:05 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.56/2.10  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.56/2.11  
% 4.56/2.11  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.56/2.13  
% 4.56/2.13  Inference rules
% 4.56/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.56/2.13  #Ref     : 0
% 4.56/2.13  #Sup     : 93
% 4.56/2.13  #Fact    : 2
% 4.56/2.13  #Define  : 0
% 4.56/2.13  #Split   : 0
% 4.56/2.13  #Chain   : 0
% 4.56/2.13  #Close   : 0
% 4.56/2.13  
% 4.56/2.13  Ordering : KBO
% 4.56/2.13  
% 4.56/2.13  Simplification rules
% 4.56/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.56/2.13  #Subsume      : 10
% 4.56/2.13  #Demod        : 14
% 4.56/2.13  #Tautology    : 43
% 4.56/2.13  #SimpNegUnit  : 9
% 4.56/2.13  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.56/2.13  
% 4.56/2.13  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.56/2.13  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.56/2.13  
% 4.56/2.13  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.56/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.56/2.13  Preprocessing        : 0.67
% 4.56/2.14  Parsing              : 0.34
% 4.56/2.14  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 4.56/2.14  Main loop            : 0.40
% 4.56/2.14  Inferencing          : 0.13
% 4.56/2.14  Reduction            : 0.13
% 4.56/2.14  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 4.56/2.14  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 4.56/2.14  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 4.56/2.14  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.56/2.14  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.56/2.14  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.56/2.14  Total                : 1.11
% 4.56/2.14  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.56/2.14  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.56/2.14  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.56/2.14  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------