TSTP Solution File: SWV365+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWV365+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.59s 1.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   55
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (   5 unt;  53 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   76 (  45   >;  31   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  19 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   34 (  34 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (;   8   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ pair_in_list > succ_cpq > strictly_less_than > pi_sharp_removemin > pi_sharp_remove > pi_sharp_find_min > pi_remove > less_than > issmallestelement_pq > contains_slb > contains_pq > contains_cpq > pi_removemin > pi_find_min > phi > ok > isnonempty_slb > isnonempty_pq > check_cpq > triple > update_slb > removemin_pq_res > removemin_pq_eff > remove_slb > remove_pqp > remove_pq > remove_cpq > pair > lookup_slb > insert_slb > insert_pqp > insert_pq > insert_cpq > findmin_pq_res > findmin_pq_eff > #nlpp > removemin_cpq_res > removemin_cpq_eff > i > findmin_pqp_res > findmin_cpq_res > findmin_cpq_eff > create_slb > create_pq > bottom > bad > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_7 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_8 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(bad,type,
    bad: $i ).

tff(insert_cpq,type,
    insert_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_sharp_find_min,type,
    pi_sharp_find_min: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pi_remove,type,
    pi_remove: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(succ_cpq,type,
    succ_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(insert_pq,type,
    insert_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_find_min,type,
    pi_find_min: $i > $o ).

tff(i,type,
    i: $i > $i ).

tff(remove_cpq,type,
    remove_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_sharp_removemin,type,
    pi_sharp_removemin: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pi_sharp_remove,type,
    pi_sharp_remove: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(contains_slb,type,
    contains_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(contains_pq,type,
    contains_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(findmin_pq_eff,type,
    findmin_pq_eff: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(lookup_slb,type,
    lookup_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(pi_removemin,type,
    pi_removemin: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(phi,type,
    phi: $i > $o ).

tff(pair_in_list,type,
    pair_in_list: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(isnonempty_pq,type,
    isnonempty_pq: $i > $o ).

tff(findmin_pq_res,type,
    findmin_pq_res: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(less_than,type,
    less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff(issmallestelement_pq,type,
    issmallestelement_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(contains_cpq,type,
    contains_cpq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(strictly_less_than,type,
    strictly_less_than: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(pair,type,
    pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ok,type,
    ok: $i > $o ).

tff(insert_pqp,type,
    insert_pqp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(remove_pq,type,
    remove_pq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_pqp_res,type,
    findmin_pqp_res: $i > $i ).

tff(remove_pqp,type,
    remove_pqp: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(bottom,type,
    bottom: $i ).

tff(removemin_pq_res,type,
    removemin_pq_res: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff(triple,type,
    triple: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(create_pq,type,
    create_pq: $i ).

tff(removemin_cpq_res,type,
    removemin_cpq_res: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff(isnonempty_slb,type,
    isnonempty_slb: $i > $o ).

tff(check_cpq,type,
    check_cpq: $i > $o ).

tff(remove_slb,type,
    remove_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_cpq_eff,type,
    findmin_cpq_eff: $i > $i ).

tff(removemin_cpq_eff,type,
    removemin_cpq_eff: $i > $i ).

tff(create_slb,type,
    create_slb: $i ).

tff(removemin_pq_eff,type,
    removemin_pq_eff: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(findmin_cpq_res,type,
    findmin_cpq_res: $i > $i ).

tff(insert_slb,type,
    insert_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(update_slb,type,
    update_slb: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_389,axiom,
    ! [U,V] : ( i(triple(U,create_slb,V)) = create_pq ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax54) ).

tff(f_439,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U,V,X,Y] : ( i(triple(U,create_slb,X)) = i(triple(V,create_slb,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_co) ).

tff(c_134,plain,
    ! [U_145,V_146] : ( i(triple(U_145,create_slb,V_146)) = create_pq ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_389]) ).

tff(c_174,plain,
    i(triple('#skF_5',create_slb,'#skF_7')) != i(triple('#skF_6',create_slb,'#skF_8')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_439]) ).

tff(c_176,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_134,c_134,c_174]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV365+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:56:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.59/1.94  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.59/1.94  
% 3.59/1.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.83/1.97  
% 3.83/1.97  Inference rules
% 3.83/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.83/1.97  #Ref     : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Sup     : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Fact    : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Define  : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Split   : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Chain   : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Close   : 0
% 3.83/1.97  
% 3.83/1.97  Ordering : KBO
% 3.83/1.97  
% 3.83/1.97  Simplification rules
% 3.83/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.83/1.97  #Subsume      : 86
% 3.83/1.97  #Demod        : 2
% 3.83/1.97  #Tautology    : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.83/1.97  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.83/1.97  
% 3.83/1.97  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.83/1.97  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.83/1.97  
% 3.83/1.97  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.83/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.83/1.97  Preprocessing        : 0.69
% 3.83/1.97  Parsing              : 0.36
% 3.83/1.97  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 3.83/1.97  Main loop            : 0.09
% 3.83/1.97  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 3.83/1.97  Reduction            : 0.04
% 3.83/1.97  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 3.83/1.97  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.83/1.97  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.83/1.97  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.83/1.97  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.83/1.97  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.83/1.97  Total                : 0.83
% 3.83/1.97  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.83/1.97  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.83/1.97  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.83/1.97  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------