TSTP Solution File: SWV361-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV361-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:38:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : SWV361-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 03:11:56 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.16/0.39 The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.16/0.39 Thu Jun 16 03:11:56 2022
% 0.16/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4652.
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.16/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.16/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 list(usable).
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.16/0.39 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.16/0.39 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.16/0.39 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.16/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.16/0.39
% 0.16/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.23/0.58 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.23/0.58 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.23/0.58 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.23/0.58 number of clauses initially in problem: 12
% 0.23/0.58 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.23/0.58 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 70
% 0.23/0.58 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.23/0.58 absolute distinct symbol count: 27
% 0.23/0.58 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.23/0.58 distinct function count: 12
% 0.23/0.58 distinct constant count: 13
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.17 sec ----> 35 [binary,34.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 Length of proof is 8. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,C),c_List_Oset(D,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,D),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 3 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 4 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(B,C),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 5 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(C),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(D,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(E)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(F),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(G),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(E),H))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(E),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 6 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 7 [] {-} c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(A))=c_Message_Oparts(A).
% 0.23/0.58 9 [] {-} c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)).
% 0.23/0.58 10 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.23/0.58 11 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.23/0.58 13 [para_from,7.1.1,3.2.2] {-} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 16 [hyper,10,4,9] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 21 [hyper,11,1] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 25 [hyper,21,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 26 [hyper,16,13] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 29 [hyper,25,2] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 33 [hyper,26,2] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 34 [hyper,33,5,9,29] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.23/0.58 35 [binary,34.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.23/0.58 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.23/0.58
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 ============ end of search ============
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 Process 4652 finished Thu Jun 16 03:11:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------