TSTP Solution File: SWV358-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:46:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.33s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   7   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f44,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f35,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X4,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f30,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X5),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X5,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f21,f3]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f17,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6,X7] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X7,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f14,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X0),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6] :
      ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X2,X6,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | c_in(X2,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:11:25 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.31  % (9526)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.33  % (9527)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9530)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9528)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9533)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.33  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,2,1,2,1,1,2]
% 0.15/0.33  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,2,1,2,1,1,2]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  % (9531)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9529)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [2,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [2,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  % (9531)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33  % (9529)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [3,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [3]
% 0.15/0.33  TRYING [3,1,1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.33  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.33  
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)Memory used [KB]: 752
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33  % (9532)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33  % (9526)Success in time 0.01 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------