TSTP Solution File: SWV358-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:33:15 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:41:10 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.49/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.53/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.53/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.62
% 0.53/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 % File : SWV358-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.53/0.63 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.53/0.63 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% 0.53/0.63 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.53/0.63 % English :
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.63 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.53/0.63 % Names :
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.53/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% 0.53/0.63 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% 0.53/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.53/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% 0.53/0.63 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.53/0.63 % Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.53/0.63 % Number of variables : 14 ( 4 sgn)
% 0.53/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.53/0.63 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.53/0.63 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.53/0.63 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.53/0.63 % axioms.
% 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.63 ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(V_A,V_B,V_X),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.53/0.63 | c_in(V_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.63 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.53/0.63 | c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.63 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.53/0.63 | c_in(V_Y,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.63 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.53/0.63 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.63 ( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.53/0.63 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.53/0.63 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.53/0.63 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.53/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.63 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.53/0.63 %VarNum:24(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.53/0.63 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.53/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:6
% 0.53/0.63 %SharedTerms:23
% 0.53/0.63 %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.53/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.53/0.63 [2]~P1(f10(a18),f5(a19),a16)
% 0.53/0.63 [1]P1(f3(a1,a2,f11(f7(a1),f12(f9(a1),f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18)))))),f4(a19,a15),a15)
% 0.53/0.63 [3]~P1(x31,x32,a16)+P1(x31,f13(x32),a16)
% 0.53/0.63 [6]P1(x61,f5(x62),a16)+~P1(x61,f13(f6(a8,x62)),a16)
% 0.53/0.63 [4]P1(x41,f13(x42),a16)+~P1(f11(x43,x41),f13(x42),a16)
% 0.53/0.63 [5]P1(x51,f13(x52),a16)+~P1(f12(x53,x51),f13(x52),a16)
% 0.53/0.63 [7]P1(x71,f6(a8,x72),a16)+~P1(f3(x73,x74,x71),f4(x72,a15),a15)
% 0.53/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.63
% 0.53/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (~P1(f10(a18),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(9,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (P1(f11(f7(a1),f12(f9(a1),f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18))))),f6(a8,a19),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,7])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (~P1(f12(x121,f10(a18)),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,5])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (~P1(f11(x141,f10(a18)),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,5,4])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (P1(f11(f7(a1),f12(f9(a1),f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18))))),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,8,5,4,3])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (P1(f11(f7(a1),f12(f9(a1),f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18))))),f5(a19),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,8,5,4,3,6])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 (P1(f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18))),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,16,3,4,5])).
% 0.54/0.64 cnf(36,plain,
% 0.54/0.64 ($false),
% 0.54/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,14,26,5,3,4]),
% 0.54/0.64 ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.64 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------