TSTP Solution File: SWV352-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV352-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 1 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 28 ( 28 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z),c_List_Oset(U,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(Z,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,U),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X)) = c_Message_Oparts(X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(Y,Z),c_List_Oset(X,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(Z,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__Server__imp__YM2_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,Y,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Z),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(U,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V,W)))),X1)),c_List_Oset(X,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Z),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(Z),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V,W))))),c_List_Oset(X,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_OSays__Server__imp__YM2_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_Ono__nonce__YM1__YM2_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Z),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(U,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(W),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V),Y1))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_Ono__nonce__YM1__YM2_0) ).
cnf(13,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0,cls_conjecture_5]) ).
cnf(15,plain,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OSays__Server__imp__YM2_0,cls_conjecture_2,cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,13]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,20]) ).
cnf(26,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),Z))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_Ono__nonce__YM1__YM2_0,24,cls_conjecture_2,cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(29,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Z),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),U)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,26]) ).
cnf(33,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,15,cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(34,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,33]),29,cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV352-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 11:46:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T11:46:11
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T11:46:11
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 #||
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 ||#
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 47 formulas have been input or derived (from 27 formulas).
% 0.19/0.51 ; 34 (72%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.19/0.51 ; 4 (12%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.51 ; 30 (88%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.004 10% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Assert (11 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.005 13% Process new row (36 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Resolution (52 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.003 8% Paramodulation (26 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 5% Backward subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (2 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Forward simplification (36 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Backward simplification (34 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.022 56% Other
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.039 Total
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.042 Real time
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; Term-hash-array has 142 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6 entries (6 at peak, 6 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 101 nodes (101 at peak, 101 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 2 possibly forward subsuming rows in 7 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Path-index has 150 entries (150 at peak, 157 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Path-index has 628 nodes (628 at peak, 630 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Trie-index has 150 entries (150 at peak, 157 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Trie-index has 725 nodes (725 at peak, 749 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 2 generalization terms in 65 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 31 instance terms in 27 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 181 unifiable terms in 431 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to give has 7 entries:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 2 with value (4 29) 2 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 32)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 2 with value (4 30)
% 0.19/0.51 Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.51 0.043 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.51 0.034856 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.51 0.008032 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.51 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.51 0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.51 4,119,368 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T11:46:11
% 0.19/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------