TSTP Solution File: SWV350-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV350-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.95s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 5 unt; 11 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 10 ( 5 >; 5 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 (; 2 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Message_Omsg_OMPair > c_List_Oset > c_Event_Oevent_ONotes > #nlpp > c_Message_Omsg_ONonce > v_k > v_evso > v_NB > v_NA > tc_Event_Oevent > c_Message_Oagent_OSpy
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OMPair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,type,
c_Message_Oagent_OSpy: $i ).
tff(tc_Event_Oevent,type,
tc_Event_Oevent: $i ).
tff(v_evso,type,
v_evso: $i ).
tff(v_NA,type,
v_NA: $i ).
tff(v_NB,type,
v_NB: $i ).
tff(c_List_Oset,type,
c_List_Oset: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_k,type,
v_k: $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes,type,
c_Event_Oevent_ONotes: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce,type,
c_Message_Omsg_ONonce: $i > $i ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
! [V_U] : ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),V_U))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_29,axiom,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [V_U_1] : ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),V_U_1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).
tff(c_5,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV350-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 22:53:37 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.95/1.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.95/1.47
% 1.95/1.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.95/1.51
% 1.95/1.51 Inference rules
% 1.95/1.51 ----------------------
% 1.95/1.51 #Ref : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Sup : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Fact : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Define : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Split : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Chain : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Close : 0
% 1.95/1.51
% 1.95/1.51 Ordering : KBO
% 1.95/1.51
% 1.95/1.51 Simplification rules
% 1.95/1.51 ----------------------
% 1.95/1.51 #Subsume : 1
% 1.95/1.51 #Demod : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Tautology : 0
% 1.95/1.51 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 1.95/1.51 #BackRed : 0
% 1.95/1.51
% 1.95/1.51 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 1.95/1.51 #Strategies tried : 1
% 1.95/1.51
% 1.95/1.51 Timing (in seconds)
% 1.95/1.51 ----------------------
% 1.95/1.51 Preprocessing : 0.39
% 1.95/1.51 Parsing : 0.21
% 1.95/1.51 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 1.95/1.51 Main loop : 0.06
% 1.95/1.51 Inferencing : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 Reduction : 0.03
% 1.95/1.51 Demodulation : 0.02
% 1.95/1.51 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 1.95/1.51 Subsumption : 0.02
% 1.95/1.51 Abstraction : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 MUC search : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 Cooper : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 Total : 0.50
% 1.95/1.51 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 Index Matching : 0.00
% 1.95/1.51 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------