TSTP Solution File: SWV349-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV349-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:33:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV349-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 04:20:36 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : SWV349-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 1 neg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 1 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.19/0.61 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.19/0.61 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.19/0.61 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.19/0.61 % axioms.
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),V_U))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.61 %ClaNum:2(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.61 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxLitNum:1
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.19/0.61 %SharedTerms:13
% 0.19/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.19/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.61 [1]P1(f2(a1,f6(f5(a4),f6(f5(a8),a9))),f3(a10,a7),a7)
% 0.19/0.61 [2]~P1(f2(a1,f6(f5(a4),f6(f5(a8),x21))),f3(a10,a7),a7)
% 0.19/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(3,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------