TSTP Solution File: SWV347-2 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:12:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.96s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:46:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.96 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.96 Process 1194 was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.96 Wed Jun 15 12:46:50 2022
% 0.44/0.96 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_1016_n027.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_1016_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.96 set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.96 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.96 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.96 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.96 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.96 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.96 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.96 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.96 clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.96 Function symbol KB weights: tc_Event_Oevent=1. v_B=1. v_evs3=1. c_Message_Oagent_OServer=1. c_Yahalom_Oyahalom=1. v_Aa=1. v_Ba=1. v_NB=1. c_Event_Obad=1. c_Message_Oagent_OSpy=1. tc_Message_Oagent=1. tc_Message_Omsg=1. v_A=1. v_NA=1. v_NAa=1. c_Message_Omsg_OMPair=1. c_List_Oset=1. c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt=1. c_Event_Oevent_OGets=1. c_Event_Oknows=1. c_Message_Omsg_OAgent=1. c_Message_Omsg_ONonce=1. c_Public_OshrK=1. tc_List_Olist=1. c_Message_Oanalz=1. c_Event_Oevent_OSays=1.
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.44/0.96 % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.44/0.96 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.44/0.96 % Maximum clause weight is 54.000.
% 0.44/0.96 % Given clauses 8.
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 1 c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) # label(cls_conjecture_11) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 2 c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) # label(cls_conjecture_2) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 3 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) # label(cls_conjecture_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 4 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) # label(cls_conjecture_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 5 -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) # label(cls_conjecture_0) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 6 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_8) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 7 -c_in(A,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) | -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(D),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(E),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(F),V6))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) | -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(V7,V8,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V9,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V10),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V12),V6))))),c_List_Oset(A,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) | c_in(V6,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg) | E = V11 # label(cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.96 8 -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(C,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(D),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(E),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(F),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) | v_Aa = E. [resolve(7,b,3,a),unit_del(a,2),unit_del(c,6)].
% 0.44/0.96 10 v_A = v_Aa. [resolve(8,a,4,a),flip(a)].
% 0.44/0.96 12 $F. [back_rewrite(5),rewrite([10(1)]),unit_del(a,1)].
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 Given=8. Generated=12. Kept=11. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.96 Usable=7. Sos=0. Demods=1. Limbo=2, Disabled=9. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.96 Megabytes=0.06.
% 0.44/0.96 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.96
% 0.44/0.96 Process 1194 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 12:46:50 2022
% 0.44/0.97 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------