TSTP Solution File: SWV347-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 14 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 4 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 22 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1,axiom,
( c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X5 = X12
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_11,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p',cls_conjecture_11) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X5 = X12
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = v_A
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X5),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
v_A = v_Aa,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
cls_conjecture_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:51:35 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCZDbjmPgr/E---3.1_4153.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_3 with pid 4237 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4241 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 437
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------