TSTP Solution File: SWV347-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:33:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 07:27:40 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.45/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.56/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.56/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.56/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.56/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.56/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64 % File : SWV347-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.56/0.64 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.56/0.64 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% 0.56/0.64 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.56/0.64 % English :
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.64 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.56/0.64 % Names :
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.56/0.64 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.11 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.13 v6.4.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.3.0, 0.06 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.56/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 7 RR)
% 0.56/0.64 % Number of literals : 11 ( 1 equ; 5 neg)
% 0.56/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% 0.56/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% 0.56/0.64 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.56/0.64 % Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.56/0.64 % Number of variables : 13 ( 9 sgn)
% 0.56/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.56/0.64 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.56/0.64 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.56/0.64 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.56/0.64 % axioms.
% 0.56/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1,axiom,
% 0.56/0.64 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
% 0.56/0.64 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(V_S_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X_H,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B_H),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V_NA_H),V_nb))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.56/0.64 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(V_C,V_S,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V_NA),V_nb))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.56/0.64 | c_in(V_nb,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.56/0.64 | V_A_H = V_A ) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.64 ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.64 c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.64 c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.64 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.64 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.64 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.56/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.64 %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:24)
% 0.56/0.64 %VarNum:20(SingletonVarNum:13)
% 0.56/0.64 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.56/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:6
% 0.56/0.64 %SharedTerms:44
% 0.56/0.64 %goalClause: 25 26 27 28 29 30
% 0.56/0.64 %singleGoalClaCount:6
% 0.56/0.64 [25]P1(a1,a2,a3)
% 0.56/0.64 [29]~P1(a19,a2,a3)
% 0.56/0.64 [26]P1(a21,a4,f18(a17))
% 0.56/0.64 [30]~P1(f14(a26),f12(f9(a11,a21)),a20)
% 0.56/0.64 [27]P1(f6(a5,f15(f10(a22),f16(f13(a22),f15(f10(a1),f15(f14(a24),f14(a26)))))),f7(a21,a17),a17)
% 0.56/0.64 [28]P1(f8(a23,a5,f15(f10(a23),f16(f13(a23),f15(f10(a19),f15(f14(a25),f14(a26)))))),f7(a21,a17),a17)
% 0.56/0.64 [31]E(x311,x312)+~P1(x314,a4,f18(a17))+P1(x313,f12(f9(a11,x314)),a20)+~P1(f8(x319,x3110,f15(x3111,f16(f13(x3112),f15(f10(x312),f15(f14(x3113),x313))))),f7(x314,a17),a17)+~P1(f6(x315,f15(x316,f16(f13(x317),f15(f10(x311),f15(f14(x318),x313))))),f7(x314,a17),a17)
% 0.56/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.64 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/0.64 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/0.64 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/0.64 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f18(x41),f18(x42))
% 0.56/0.64 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f10(x51),f10(x52))
% 0.56/0.64 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f13(x61),f13(x62))
% 0.56/0.64 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f8(x71,x73,x74),f8(x72,x73,x74))
% 0.56/0.64 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f8(x83,x81,x84),f8(x83,x82,x84))
% 0.56/0.64 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f8(x93,x94,x91),f8(x93,x94,x92))
% 0.56/0.64 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f14(x101),f14(x102))
% 0.56/0.64 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f6(x111,x113),f6(x112,x113))
% 0.56/0.64 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f6(x123,x121),f6(x123,x122))
% 0.56/0.64 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f15(x131,x133),f15(x132,x133))
% 0.56/0.64 [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f15(x143,x141),f15(x143,x142))
% 0.56/0.64 [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f7(x151,x153),f7(x152,x153))
% 0.56/0.64 [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f7(x163,x161),f7(x163,x162))
% 0.56/0.64 [17]~E(x171,x172)+E(f16(x171,x173),f16(x172,x173))
% 0.56/0.64 [18]~E(x181,x182)+E(f16(x183,x181),f16(x183,x182))
% 0.56/0.64 [19]~E(x191,x192)+E(f12(x191),f12(x192))
% 0.56/0.64 [20]~E(x201,x202)+E(f9(x201,x203),f9(x202,x203))
% 0.56/0.64 [21]~E(x211,x212)+E(f9(x213,x211),f9(x213,x212))
% 0.56/0.64 [22]P1(x222,x223,x224)+~E(x221,x222)+~P1(x221,x223,x224)
% 0.56/0.64 [23]P1(x233,x232,x234)+~E(x231,x232)+~P1(x233,x231,x234)
% 0.56/0.64 [24]P1(x243,x244,x242)+~E(x241,x242)+~P1(x243,x244,x241)
% 0.56/0.64
% 0.56/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.65 cnf(33,plain,
% 0.56/0.65 ($false),
% 0.56/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,29,26,30,28,27,22,31]),
% 0.56/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------