TSTP Solution File: SWV346-1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV346-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ~ sPE(v_na,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | sPE(v_na,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_Ounique__session__keys__dest_2)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV346-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:05:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  % symbols: 367
% 0.13/0.41  % clauses: 3255
% 0.13/0.41  % start clauses: 8
% 0.13/0.41  % iterative deepening steps: 24
% 0.13/0.41  % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.13/0.41  % literal attempts: 7278
% 0.13/0.41  % depth failures: 6726
% 0.13/0.41  % regularity failures: 12
% 0.13/0.41  % tautology failures: 309
% 0.13/0.41  % reductions: 348
% 0.13/0.41  % extensions: 6803
% 0.13/0.41  % SAT variables: 5268
% 0.13/0.41  % SAT clauses: 4394
% 0.13/0.41  % WalkSAT solutions: 4388
% 0.13/0.41  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------