TSTP Solution File: SWV345-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWV345-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
~ sPE(v_nb,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ sPE(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_nb)
| sPE(v_nb,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| sPE(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_nb) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_Ounique__session__keys__dest_3)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV345-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:20:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 % symbols: 367
% 0.19/0.50 % clauses: 3255
% 0.19/0.50 % start clauses: 8
% 0.19/0.50 % iterative deepening steps: 24
% 0.19/0.50 % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.19/0.50 % literal attempts: 41769
% 0.19/0.50 % depth failures: 18065
% 0.19/0.50 % regularity failures: 28
% 0.19/0.50 % tautology failures: 343
% 0.19/0.50 % reductions: 23373
% 0.19/0.50 % extensions: 18285
% 0.19/0.50 % SAT variables: 35116
% 0.19/0.50 % SAT clauses: 32411
% 0.19/0.50 % WalkSAT solutions: 32407
% 0.19/0.50 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------