TSTP Solution File: SWV342-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV342-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 1 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 21 ( 21 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z),c_List_Oset(U,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(Z,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,U)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,Y)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Event_Oused(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X)) = c_Message_Oparts(X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).
cnf(10,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,cls_conjecture_9]) ).
cnf(14,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,10]) ).
cnf(19,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Y,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,14]) ).
cnf(29,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(Y,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Z,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,19]) ).
cnf(202,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,11]),29,cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SWV342-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:42:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.42 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.43 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.43 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.43 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.17/0.43 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.17/0.43 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.17/0.43 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.43 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.43 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.17/0.43 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.17/0.43 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.17/0.43 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.17/0.43 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.43 "."
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.44 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T01:42:29
% 0.17/0.44 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T01:42:29
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 #||
% 0.17/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.48 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.48 ||#
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.17/0.48 ; 208 formulas have been input or derived (from 137 formulas).
% 0.17/0.48 ; 202 (97%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.17/0.48 ; 202 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.17/0.48 ;
% 0.17/0.48 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.001 2% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Assert (9 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.014 32% Process new row (205 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.005 11% Resolution (272 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.001 2% Paramodulation (136 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (8 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (8 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.003 7% Forward simplification (205 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.003 7% Backward simplification (202 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.001 2% Ordering (8 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.016 36% Other
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.044 Total
% 0.17/0.48 ; 0.046 Real time
% 0.17/0.48 ;
% 0.17/0.48 ; Term-hash-array has 479 terms in all.
% 0.17/0.48 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6 entries (6 at peak, 6 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.48 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 28 nodes (28 at peak, 28 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.48 ; Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 8 calls.
% 0.17/0.48 ; Retrieved 2 possibly backward subsumed rows in 6 calls.
% 0.17/0.48 ; Path-index has 489 entries (489 at peak, 489 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.48 ; Path-index has 1,776 nodes (1,776 at peak, 1,776 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.48 ; Trie-index has 489 entries (489 at peak, 489 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.48 ; Trie-index has 2,139 nodes (2,139 at peak, 2,139 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.48 ; Retrieved 2 generalization terms in 342 calls.
% 0.17/0.48 ; Retrieved 195 instance terms in 195 calls.
% 0.17/0.48 ; Retrieved 699 unifiable terms in 2,003 calls.
% 0.17/0.48 ;
% 0.17/0.48 ; The agenda of rows to give has 65 entries:
% 0.17/0.48 ; 1 with value (4 20) 64 with value (4 35)
% 0.17/0.48 Evaluation took:
% 0.17/0.48 0.047 seconds of real time
% 0.17/0.48 0.042067 seconds of user run time
% 0.17/0.48 0.004252 seconds of system run time
% 0.17/0.48 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.17/0.48 0 page faults and
% 0.17/0.48 5,072,864 bytes consed.
% 0.17/0.48 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.17/0.48 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T01:42:29
% 0.17/0.48 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.17/0.48 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------