TSTP Solution File: SWV342-2 by Gandalf---c-2.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SWV342-2 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art08.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23994/SWV/SWV342-2+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: heq
% detected subclass: small
% detected subclass: short
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (binary-unit-uniteq 30 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 120 #f 7 3)
% (binary-posweight-order 240 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 60 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 12 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 24 #f)
% (hyper 30 #f)
% (binary 24 #t)
% (binary-order 30 #f)
% (binary-unit 30 #f)
% 
% 
% **** EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED ****
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(10,40,0,20,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 12 [] c_in(X,c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,Y)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(Z,U,X),c_^list_^oset(Y,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 13 [] -c_in(X,c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,Y)),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(X,c_^event_^oused(Y),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 15 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,Y),c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(Y,c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 16 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(X,Y),c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(Y,c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 17 [] c_in(X,c_^message_^oparts(Y),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(X,Y,tc_^message_^omsg).
% 18 [] equal(c_^message_^oparts(c_^message_^oanalz(X)),c_^message_^oparts(X)).
% 19 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^event_^oused(v_evs3),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 20 [] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs3,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 26 [binary:19,13.2] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs3)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 28 [binary:15.2,26] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs3)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 31 [binary:20,12.2] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs3)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 34 [binary:16.2,28] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs3)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 41 [binary:17.2,31,demod:18] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_na,v_nb)))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs3)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 45 [binary:15.2,34,slowcut:41] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using binary resolution
% not using sos strategy
% using unit paramodulation strategy
% using unit strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% seconds given: 30
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    20
%  derived clauses:   26
%  kept clauses:      17
%  kept size sum:     219
%  kept mid-nuclei:   0
%  kept new demods:   1
%  forw unit-subs:    2
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  0
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime  :  0.1
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP23994/SWV/SWV342-2+eq_r.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------