TSTP Solution File: SWV341-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV341-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.18s 1.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 7 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 6 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 (; 10 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Event_Oknows > #nlpp > c_Message_Oparts > c_Message_Omsg_OKey > c_Message_Oanalz > c_Event_Oused > v_evs3 > v_K > tc_Message_Omsg > c_Message_Oagent_OSpy
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Event_Oknows,type,
c_Event_Oknows: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_K,type,
v_K: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oanalz,type,
c_Message_Oanalz: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,type,
c_Message_Oagent_OSpy: $i ).
tff(v_evs3,type,
v_evs3: $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(c_Event_Oused,type,
c_Event_Oused: $i > $i ).
tff(tc_Message_Omsg,type,
tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Oparts,type,
c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OKey: $i > $i ).
tff(f_27,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_38,axiom,
! [V_X,V_H] :
( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_33,axiom,
! [V_c,V_evs] :
( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [V_X_3,V_H_4] :
( c_in(V_X_3,c_Message_Oparts(V_H_4),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(V_X_3,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H_4),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [V_c_7,V_evs_8] :
( c_in(V_c_7,c_Event_Oused(V_evs_8),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(V_c_7,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs_8)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).
tff(c_16,plain,
! [V_X_9,V_evs_10] :
( c_in(V_X_9,c_Event_Oused(V_evs_10),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(V_X_9,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs_10)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_10]) ).
tff(c_19,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_16]) ).
tff(c_23,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_19]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWV341-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 23:34:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.18/1.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.18/1.58
% 2.18/1.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.18/1.61
% 2.18/1.61 Inference rules
% 2.18/1.61 ----------------------
% 2.18/1.61 #Ref : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Sup : 2
% 2.18/1.61 #Fact : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Define : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Split : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Chain : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Close : 0
% 2.18/1.61
% 2.18/1.61 Ordering : KBO
% 2.18/1.61
% 2.18/1.61 Simplification rules
% 2.18/1.61 ----------------------
% 2.18/1.61 #Subsume : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Demod : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Tautology : 0
% 2.18/1.61 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.18/1.61 #BackRed : 0
% 2.18/1.61
% 2.18/1.61 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.18/1.61 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.18/1.61
% 2.18/1.61 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.18/1.61 ----------------------
% 2.18/1.61 Preprocessing : 0.40
% 2.18/1.61 Parsing : 0.22
% 2.18/1.61 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.18/1.62 Main loop : 0.15
% 2.18/1.62 Inferencing : 0.08
% 2.18/1.62 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.18/1.62 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.18/1.62 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.18/1.62 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.18/1.62 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.18/1.62 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.18/1.62 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.18/1.62 Total : 0.59
% 2.18/1.62 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.18/1.62 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.18/1.62 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.18/1.62 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------