TSTP Solution File: SWV339-2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV339-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:42:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(u)),c_Event_Oused(v),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('SWV339-2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('SWV339-2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( equal(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_K)
| equal(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),v_K) ),
file('SWV339-2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,plain,
( equal(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),v_K)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(u),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,1]),
[iquote('0:SpR:3.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(6,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(u),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[4]),
[iquote('1:Spt:4.1')] ).
cnf(7,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[6,2]),
[iquote('1:UnC:6.0,2.0')] ).
cnf(8,plain,
equal(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),v_K),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[4]),
[iquote('1:Spt:7.0,4.0')] ).
cnf(9,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(u),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,1]),
[iquote('1:SpR:8.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(11,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[9,2]),
[iquote('1:UnC:9.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV339-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:24:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.42 SPASS derived 5 clauses, backtracked 1 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 7 clauses.
% 0.20/0.42 SPASS allocated 63082 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.05 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.42 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 9 :
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0 cls_conjecture_6 cls_conjecture_8
% 0.20/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------