%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SWV337-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:02:53 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17997/SWV/SWV337-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 196] [nf = 0] [nu = 184] [ut = 160]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 14081] [nf = 0] [nu = 9407] [ut = 2438]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 304043] [nf = 1] [nu = 223472] [ut = 11608]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 2114725] [nf = 8192] [nu = 1542692] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 41 secs [nr = 10163284] [nf = 53216] [nu = 7038954] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 30063312] [nf = 102300] [nu = 21373238] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 30153490] [nf = 102300] [nu = 21446969] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 124 secs [nr = 30555169] [nf = 102303] [nu = 21766446] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 131 secs [nr = 32456784] [nf = 110505] [nu = 23101636] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 167 secs [nr = 41152799] [nf = 167903] [nu = 28597910] [ut = 12296]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 73669908
% 	resolvents: 73374859	factors: 295049
% Number of unit clauses generated: 49428689
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 67.09
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4		[1] = 156	[2] = 2278	[3] = 9170	
% [4] = 688	
% Total = 12296
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 49428689	[2] = 22460491	[3] = 1758965	[4] = 21741	[5] = 22	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_in_3		(+)8	(-)12288
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)8	(-)12288
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 12296
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 36758601
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 73669908
% Number of unification failures: 89685518
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 98304
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 645823437
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1044501
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 37491531
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 36417999
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 31
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 14
% Number of states in UCFA table: 147560
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 352400
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.28
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.42
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 62
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 163355426
% ConstructUnitClause() = 37503823
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 74.61 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 245566
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------