TSTP Solution File: SWV335-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV335-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:56:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 10 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f19,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f18,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X4] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0) ).
fof(f17,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( c_in(X5,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X5,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).
fof(f16,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f15,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1) ).
fof(f15,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f4]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f13,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X8,X6,X7,X5] :
( ~ c_in(X5,c_union(X6,X7,X8),X8)
| c_in(X5,X7,X8)
| c_in(X5,X6,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
fof(f13,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f11,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X1] :
( ~ c_in(X3,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X3,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV335-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:20:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 % (18899)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18905)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18909)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18916)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (18915)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52 % (18905)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.52 % (18901)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Time elapsed: 0.067 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (18916)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (18888)Success in time 0.166 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------