TSTP Solution File: SWV335-2 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV335-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:12:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.83s 1.08s
% Output : Refutation 0.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV335-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:02:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.83/1.08 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.83/1.08 Process 27504 was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.83/1.08 Wed Jun 15 16:02:36 2022
% 0.83/1.08 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_27168_n011.cluster.edu".
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_27168_n011.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.83/1.08 set(auto2).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.83/1.08 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.83/1.08 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.83/1.08 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.83/1.08 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.83/1.08 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.83/1.08 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.83/1.08 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.83/1.08 clear(print_given).
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (9 formulas)
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.83/1.08 Function symbol KB weights: tc_Message_Omsg=1. c_Message_Oagent_OSpy=1. v_X=1. v_evsf=1. v_K=1. v_NB=1. c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt=1. c_Event_Oknows=1. c_Message_Osynth=1. c_Message_Oanalz=1. c_Message_Oparts=1. c_Message_Omsg_ONonce=1. c_insert=1. c_union=1.
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.83/1.08 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.83/1.08 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.83/1.08 % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.83/1.08 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.83/1.08 % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 0.83/1.08 % Given clauses 14.
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 1 c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 2 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_3) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 3 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_2) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 4 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_conjecture_4) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 5 -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 6 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(A),c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(A),B,tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 7 -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D) | c_in(A,C,D) | c_in(A,B,D) # label(cls_Set_OUnE_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 8 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),C,tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 9 -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(B,C,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) | -c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),tc_Message_Omsg) | c_in(A,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) # label(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.83/1.08 11 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg). [ur(5,b,4,a)].
% 0.83/1.08 12 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg). [ur(6,b,3,a)].
% 0.83/1.08 15 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg). [resolve(9,a,2,a),unit_del(a,1)].
% 0.83/1.08 20 -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg). [ur(8,b,12,a,c,11,a)].
% 0.83/1.08 33 $F. [ur(7,b,4,a,c,20,a),unit_del(a,15)].
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 Given=14. Generated=42. Kept=32. proofs=1.
% 0.83/1.08 Usable=14. Sos=15. Demods=0. Limbo=3, Disabled=9. Hints=0.
% 0.83/1.08 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.83/1.08 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.83/1.08 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.83/1.08
% 0.83/1.08 Process 27504 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 16:02:36 2022
% 0.83/1.08 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------