TSTP Solution File: SWV335-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV335-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  13 unt;   4 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,X3,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1,axiom,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,X3,X4)
    | c_in(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4) ),
    cls_Set_OUnE_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_4 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.23  % Problem    : SWV335-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.25  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.24/0.46  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.46  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.24/0.46  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.24/0.46  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.24/0.46  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.24/0.46  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:40:16 EDT 2023
% 0.24/0.46  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.58/0.75  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.58/0.75  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7uMrdgb9eJ/E---3.1_5648.p
% 0.58/0.82  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.58/0.82  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.82  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # new_bool_3 with pid 5835 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.58/0.82  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.82  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.82  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.82  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 70s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 5842 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.58/0.82  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.82  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.82  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.82  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/0.82  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 70s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.82  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.58/0.82  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.58/0.82  
% 0.58/0.82  # Proof found!
% 0.58/0.82  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.58/0.82  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.82  # Parsed axioms                        : 1485
% 0.58/0.82  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1327
% 0.58/0.82  # Initial clauses                      : 158
% 0.58/0.82  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 158
% 0.58/0.82  # Processed clauses                    : 350
% 0.58/0.82  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.58/0.82  # ...subsumed                          : 26
% 0.58/0.82  # ...remaining for further processing  : 323
% 0.58/0.82  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.58/0.82  # Generated clauses                    : 389
% 0.58/0.82  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 332
% 0.58/0.82  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Paramodulations                      : 368
% 0.58/0.82  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Equation resolutions                 : 21
% 0.58/0.82  # Total rewrite steps                  : 20
% 0.58/0.82  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.58/0.82  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.58/0.82  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.58/0.82  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.58/0.82  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.58/0.82  # Current number of processed clauses  : 182
% 0.58/0.82  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 34
% 0.58/0.82  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.58/0.82  #    Negative unit clauses             : 24
% 0.58/0.82  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 124
% 0.58/0.82  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 278
% 0.58/0.82  # ...number of literals in the above   : 483
% 0.58/0.82  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Current number of archived clauses   : 141
% 0.58/0.82  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8500
% 0.58/0.82  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7295
% 0.58/0.82  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.58/0.82  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 386
% 0.58/0.82  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 20
% 0.58/0.82  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.58/0.82  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.58/0.82  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 17625
% 0.58/0.82  
% 0.58/0.82  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.82  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.58/0.82  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.58/0.82  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.58/0.82  # Maximum resident set size: 3076 pages
% 0.58/0.82  
% 0.58/0.82  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.82  # User time                : 0.049 s
% 0.58/0.82  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.58/0.82  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.58/0.82  # Maximum resident set size: 2500 pages
% 0.58/0.82  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.58/0.82  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------