TSTP Solution File: SWV334-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWV334-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.28s 1.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 13 ( 6 >; 7 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 (; 2 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Event_Oevent_OSays > c_Message_Omsg_OMPair > c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt > c_List_Oset > #nlpp > c_Message_Omsg_ONonce > v_evs4 > v_Xa > v_NB > v_K > v_B > v_A > tc_Event_Oevent
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OMPair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_K,type,
v_K: $i ).
tff(v_evs4,type,
v_evs4: $i ).
tff(tc_Event_Oevent,type,
tc_Event_Oevent: $i ).
tff(v_NB,type,
v_NB: $i ).
tff(c_List_Oset,type,
c_List_Oset: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(v_Xa,type,
v_Xa: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt,type,
c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_B,type,
v_B: $i ).
tff(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce,type,
c_Message_Omsg_ONonce: $i > $i ).
tff(v_A,type,
v_A: $i ).
tff(c_Event_Oevent_OSays,type,
c_Event_Oevent_OSays: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
! [V_U] : ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_29,axiom,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_Xa,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [V_U_1] : ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U_1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_Xa,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).
tff(c_5,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : SWV334-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 23:35:30 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 2.28/1.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.28/1.54
% 2.28/1.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.28/1.58
% 2.28/1.58 Inference rules
% 2.28/1.58 ----------------------
% 2.28/1.58 #Ref : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Sup : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Fact : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Define : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Split : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Chain : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Close : 0
% 2.28/1.58
% 2.28/1.58 Ordering : KBO
% 2.28/1.58
% 2.28/1.58 Simplification rules
% 2.28/1.58 ----------------------
% 2.28/1.58 #Subsume : 1
% 2.28/1.58 #Demod : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Tautology : 0
% 2.28/1.58 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.28/1.58 #BackRed : 0
% 2.28/1.58
% 2.28/1.58 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.28/1.58 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.28/1.58
% 2.28/1.58 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.28/1.58 ----------------------
% 2.28/1.58 Preprocessing : 0.38
% 2.28/1.58 Parsing : 0.21
% 2.28/1.58 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.28/1.58 Main loop : 0.05
% 2.28/1.58 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.28/1.58 Reduction : 0.02
% 2.28/1.58 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.28/1.58 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.28/1.58 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.28/1.58 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.28/1.58 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.28/1.58 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.28/1.59 Total : 0.49
% 2.28/1.59 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.28/1.59 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.28/1.59 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.28/1.59 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------