TSTP Solution File: SWV331-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV331-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:33:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV331-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 07:33:46 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.46/0.61 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.64 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.46/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.46/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.46/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.46/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.46/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 % File : SWV331-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.46/0.65 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.46/0.65 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% 0.46/0.65 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.46/0.65 % English :
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.46/0.65 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.46/0.65 % Names :
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.65 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.46/0.65 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% 0.46/0.65 % Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% 0.46/0.65 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.46/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.46/0.65 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.46/0.65 % Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.46/0.65 % Number of variables : 5 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.46/0.65 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.46/0.65 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.46/0.65 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.46/0.65 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.46/0.65 % axioms.
% 0.46/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.65 c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ).
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.65 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.65 c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat) ).
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.65 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(cls_Public_OCrypt__imp__keysFor_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.65 ( ~ c_in(V_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
% 0.46/0.65 | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.46/0.65 | c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),tc_nat) ) ).
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(cls_Yahalom_Onew__keys__not__used_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.65 ( ~ c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs))),tc_nat)
% 0.46/0.65 | ~ c_in(V_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
% 0.46/0.65 | ~ c_in(V_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
% 0.46/0.65 | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 % Proof found
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.65 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.46/0.65 %VarNum:12(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.46/0.65 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.46/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.46/0.65 %SharedTerms:20
% 0.46/0.65 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.46/0.65 %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.46/0.65 [1]P1(a1,a2,a11)
% 0.46/0.65 [2]P1(a16,a12,f14(a13))
% 0.46/0.65 [4]~P1(f9(a1),f7(a16),a15)
% 0.46/0.65 [3]P1(f4(a1,f3(a17)),f10(f6(a5,a16)),a15)
% 0.46/0.65 [5]~P1(x51,a2,a11)+P1(x51,f8(x52),a11)+~P1(f4(x51,x53),x52,a15)
% 0.46/0.65 [6]~P1(x61,a2,a11)+P1(f9(x61),f7(x62),a15)+~P1(x62,a12,f14(a13))+~P1(x61,f8(f10(f6(a5,x62))),a11)
% 0.46/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.65 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.46/0.65 ($false),
% 0.46/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,3,5,6]),
% 0.46/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------