TSTP Solution File: SWV331-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWV331-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:03:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.43s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   24
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  11 unt;  18 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  15   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (   9   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;  10   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt > c_Event_Oknows > #nlpp > tc_List_Olist > c_Message_Oparts > c_Message_Omsg_ONonce > c_Message_Omsg_OKey > c_Message_OkeysFor > c_Event_Oused > v_evs3 > v_NB > v_K > tc_nat > tc_Message_Omsg > tc_Event_Oevent > c_Yahalom_Oyahalom > c_Message_OsymKeys > c_Message_Oagent_OSpy

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Event_Oknows,type,
    c_Event_Oknows: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v_K,type,
    v_K: $i ).

tff(c_Message_OkeysFor,type,
    c_Message_OkeysFor: $i > $i ).

tff(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,type,
    c_Message_Oagent_OSpy: $i ).

tff(tc_Event_Oevent,type,
    tc_Event_Oevent: $i ).

tff(v_NB,type,
    v_NB: $i ).

tff(v_evs3,type,
    v_evs3: $i ).

tff(tc_List_Olist,type,
    tc_List_Olist: $i > $i ).

tff(c_Message_OsymKeys,type,
    c_Message_OsymKeys: $i ).

tff(c_in,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(tc_nat,type,
    tc_nat: $i ).

tff(c_Event_Oused,type,
    c_Event_Oused: $i > $i ).

tff(tc_Message_Omsg,type,
    tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).

tff(c_Message_Oparts,type,
    c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).

tff(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce: $i > $i ).

tff(c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,type,
    c_Yahalom_Oyahalom: $i ).

tff(c_Message_Omsg_OKey,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_OKey: $i > $i ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [V_K,V_X,V_H] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H),tc_nat) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [V_K,V_evs] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs))),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(V_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(V_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_13,plain,
    ! [V_K_6,V_H_7,V_X_8] :
      ( c_in(V_K_6,c_Message_OkeysFor(V_H_7),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K_6,V_X_8),V_H_7,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(V_K_6,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ( c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3))),tc_nat)
    | ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_13]) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3))),tc_nat),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_16]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [V_K_4,V_evs_5] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K_4),c_Event_Oused(V_evs_5),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(V_evs_5,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
      | ~ c_in(V_K_4,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(V_K_4,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs_5))),tc_nat) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_23,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_12]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_2,c_23]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWV331-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:56:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.43/1.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.43/1.62  
% 2.43/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.72/1.66  
% 2.72/1.66  Inference rules
% 2.72/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.72/1.66  #Ref     : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Sup     : 2
% 2.72/1.66  #Fact    : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Define  : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Split   : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Chain   : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Close   : 0
% 2.72/1.66  
% 2.72/1.66  Ordering : KBO
% 2.72/1.66  
% 2.72/1.66  Simplification rules
% 2.72/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.72/1.66  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Demod        : 3
% 2.72/1.66  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.72/1.66  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.72/1.66  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.72/1.66  
% 2.72/1.66  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.72/1.66  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.72/1.66  
% 2.72/1.66  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.72/1.66  ----------------------
% 2.72/1.66  Preprocessing        : 0.41
% 2.72/1.66  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.72/1.66  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.72/1.66  Main loop            : 0.15
% 2.72/1.66  Inferencing          : 0.07
% 2.72/1.66  Reduction            : 0.04
% 2.72/1.66  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.72/1.66  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.72/1.66  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.72/1.66  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.72/1.66  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.72/1.66  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.72/1.66  Total                : 0.62
% 2.72/1.66  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.72/1.66  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.72/1.66  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.72/1.66  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------