TSTP Solution File: SWV324-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWV324-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:45:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.80s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 1.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   8   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   23 (  23 usr;  13 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f11,f16,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X4),c_Message_Oparts(X5),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X4,c_Message_Oparts(X5),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f15,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X7,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X7,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X5),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X5),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f14,f6]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f6]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(X6,c_Message_Oanalz(X5),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X6,c_Message_Oparts(X5),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X0,X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f10,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f3,f2]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SWV324-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:19:20 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.53/0.58  % (9983)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.53/0.58  % (9997)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 1.53/0.58  % (9989)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 1.53/0.59  % (9989)First to succeed.
% 1.80/0.59  % (9997)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.80/0.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.80/0.59  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)------------------------------
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.80/0.59  
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Time elapsed: 0.086 s
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)------------------------------
% 1.80/0.59  % (9989)------------------------------
% 1.80/0.59  % (9974)Success in time 0.236 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------