TSTP Solution File: SWV324-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV324-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SWV324-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:20:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37  Wed Jun 15 18:20:48 2022
% 0.14/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28464.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.21/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.21/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.21/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 56
% 0.21/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 25
% 0.21/0.40     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.21/0.40     distinct function count: 10
% 0.21/0.40     distinct constant count: 13
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.16 sec ----> 20 [binary,19.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  1 [] {+} -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.38/0.56  2 [] {-} c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  3 [copy,2,unit_del,1] {-} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  4 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,C),c_List_Oset(D,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,D)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  5 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  6 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  7 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  8 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.38/0.56  9 [] {-} c_Public_OshrK(v_A)=v_K|c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.38/0.56  11,10 [copy,9,unit_del,1] {-} c_Public_OshrK(v_A)=v_K.
% 0.38/0.56  13 [back_demod,3,demod,11] {-} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  14 [hyper,8,4] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  15 [hyper,14,6] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  16 [hyper,15,5] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  17 [hyper,16,5] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  18 [hyper,17,7] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  19 [hyper,18,5] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.38/0.56  20 [binary,19.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.38/0.56  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  ============ end of search ============
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  true clauses given           6      (66.7%)
% 0.38/0.56  false clauses given          3
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.38/0.56  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.38/0.56  
% 0.38/0.56  Process 28464 finished Wed Jun 15 18:20:48 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------