TSTP Solution File: SWV323-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV323-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:20:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SWV323-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 03:01:40 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.33 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.33 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.16/0.33 #
% 0.16/0.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.33 # Number of axioms: 17 Number of unprocessed: 17
% 0.16/0.33 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.16/0.33 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.16/0.33 # Hello from C++
% 0.16/0.34 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.16/0.34 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.16/0.34 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.16/0.34 # 17 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.16/0.34 # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures.
% 0.16/0.34 # There are 5 start rule candidates:
% 0.16/0.34 # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.16/0.34 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.16/0.34 # 5 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.16/0.34 # 15 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.16/0.34 # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.16/0.34 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5
% 0.16/0.34 # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.16/0.34 # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.16/0.34 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.34 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.34 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 # End clausification derivation
% 0.16/0.34 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_evs4,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X3,X4,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_sko__usf(X1,X2,X3),X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(X3,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X3,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X3,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.16/0.34 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.16/0.34 # Found 4 steps
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_evs4,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (c_in(v_evs4,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_150, plain, (c_in(v_evs4,c_insert(X10,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_183, plain, (c_in(v_evs4,c_insert(X7,c_insert(X10,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_183, ...])).
% 0.16/0.34 # End printing tableau
% 0.16/0.34 # SZS output end
% 0.16/0.34 # Branches closed with saturati# There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.16/0.34 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.16/0.34 on will be marked with an "s"
% 0.16/0.34 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.34 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.34 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 # End clausification derivation
% 0.16/0.34 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_evs4,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X3,X4,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_sko__usf(X1,X2,X3),X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(X3,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X3,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X3,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))).
% 0.16/0.34 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.16/0.34 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.16/0.34 # Found 4 steps
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_150, plain, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_insert(X10,c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.16/0.34 cnf(i_0_183, plain, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_insert(X7,c_insert(X10,c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_183, ...])).
% 0.16/0.34 # End printing tableau
% 0.16/0.34 # SZS output end
% 0.16/0.34 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.16/0.34 # Child (19628) has found a proof.
% 0.16/0.34
% 0.16/0.34 # Proof search is over...
% 0.16/0.34 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------