TSTP Solution File: SWV319-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV319-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:44:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 12 unt; 2 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 3 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV319-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:19:08 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wAGFbNzGcR/E---3.1_30583.p
% 0.22/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # new_bool_3 with pid 30686 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 30692 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.22/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.22/0.51 # Processed clauses : 23
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.22/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.22/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.22/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.22/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.22/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.22/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 500
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.51 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1632 pages
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------