TSTP Solution File: SWV318-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV318-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.06s 2.25s
% Output   : Refutation 2.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  14 unt;   2 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (   3 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   27 (  27 usr;  13 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z),c_List_Oset(U,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(Z,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,U)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X)) = c_Message_Oparts(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__cut__eq_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oparts(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__cut__eq_0) ).

cnf(cls_OtwayRees_OGets__imp__Says__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(Y,Z),c_List_Oset(X,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_sko__usf(Y,Z,X),Y,Z),c_List_Oset(X,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_OGets__imp__Says__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_evs4,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_sko__usf(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),v_evs4),v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OtwayRees_OGets__imp__Says__dest_0,cls_conjecture_0,cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(808,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,21]) ).

cnf(810,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,808]),cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(813,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,810]) ).

cnf(902,plain,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,813]) ).

cnf(917,plain,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__cut__eq_0,902]) ).

cnf(918,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,917,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(919,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7,917,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1699,plain,
    c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4,919]) ).

cnf(1700,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[918,1699]) ).

cnf(1701,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,1700]) ).

cnf(1705,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0,1699]) ).

cnf(1706,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1701,1705]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV318-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 04:36:09 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T04:36:09
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T04:36:09
% 2.06/2.25  
% 2.06/2.25  
% 2.06/2.25  #||
% 2.06/2.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.06/2.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.06/2.26  ||#
% 2.06/2.26  
% 2.06/2.26  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.06/2.26  ;      1858 formulas have been input or derived (from 174 formulas).
% 2.06/2.26  ;      1706 (92%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.06/2.26  ;         1484 (87%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.06/2.26  ;          222 (13%) are still being kept.
% 2.06/2.26  ; 
% 2.06/2.26  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.004   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (14 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.392  22%   Process new row              (1,743 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.017   1%   Resolution                   (346 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.008   0%   Paramodulation               (173 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.001   0%   Factoring                    (125 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.029   2%   Condensing                   (1,605 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.908  51%   Forward subsumption          (1,605 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.123   7%   Backward subsumption         (1,582 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.057   3%   Clause clause subsumption    (23,326 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.055   3%   Forward simplification       (1,732 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.149   8%   Backward simplification      (1,706 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.003   0%   Ordering                     (1,400 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     0.029   2%   Other
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1.776        Total
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1.778        Real time
% 2.06/2.26  ; 
% 2.06/2.26  ; Term-hash-array has 5,396 terms in all.
% 2.06/2.26  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 99 entries (809 at peak, 1,582 added, 1,483 deleted).
% 2.06/2.26  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,009 nodes (12,321 at peak, 19,839 added, 17,830 deleted).
% 2.06/2.26  ;  Retrieved 15,493 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,605 calls.
% 2.06/2.26  ;  Retrieved 7,862 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,582 calls.
% 2.06/2.26  ; Path-index has 660 entries (3,035 at peak, 5,539 added, 4,879 deleted).
% 2.06/2.26  ; Path-index has 27,601 nodes (33,312 at peak, 43,399 added, 15,798 deleted).
% 2.06/2.26  ; Trie-index has 660 entries (3,035 at peak, 5,539 added, 4,879 deleted).
% 2.06/2.26  ; Trie-index has 3,883 nodes (33,408 at peak, 55,904 added, 52,021 deleted).
% 2.06/2.26  ; Retrieved 1 generalization term in 11,397 calls.
% 2.06/2.26  ; Retrieved 126 instance terms in 123 calls.
% 2.06/2.26  ; Retrieved 2,041 unifiable terms in 2,542 calls.
% 2.06/2.26  ; 
% 2.06/2.26  ; The agenda of rows to give has 176 entries:
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 11)          2 with value (4 33)           5 with value (4 49)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 13)          5 with value (4 34)           6 with value (4 50)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     2 with value (4 16)          2 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 51)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 18)          7 with value (4 36)           4 with value (4 52)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 20)          4 with value (4 37)           4 with value (4 53)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 22)          8 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 54)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 23)          8 with value (4 39)           3 with value (4 55)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 24)          7 with value (4 40)           3 with value (4 56)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 25)          7 with value (4 41)           3 with value (4 58)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     6 with value (4 26)         10 with value (4 42)           2 with value (4 59)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     2 with value (4 27)          6 with value (4 43)           2 with value (4 61)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     5 with value (4 28)          6 with value (4 44)           2 with value (4 62)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     2 with value (4 29)         10 with value (4 45)           2 with value (4 64)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     5 with value (4 30)          5 with value (4 46)           2 with value (4 65)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     1 with value (4 31)          5 with value (4 47)           1 with value (4 67)
% 2.06/2.26  ;     4 with value (4 32)          6 with value (4 48)           1 with value (4 68)
% 2.06/2.26  Evaluation took:
% 2.06/2.26    1.78 seconds of real time
% 2.06/2.26    1.677272 seconds of user run time
% 2.06/2.26    0.101907 seconds of system run time
% 2.06/2.26    [Run times include 0.216 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.06/2.26    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.06/2.26    0 page faults and
% 2.06/2.26    236,939,928 bytes consed.
% 2.06/2.26  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.06/2.26  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T04:36:11
% 2.06/2.26  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.06/2.26  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------