TSTP Solution File: SWV317-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV317-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   9 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   3 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_KAB
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JWVmgtCtRj/E---3.1_12848.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JWVmgtCtRj/E---3.1_12848.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JWVmgtCtRj/E---3.1_12848.p',cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JWVmgtCtRj/E---3.1_12848.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_KAB
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    cls_conjecture_7 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_KAB,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_KAB),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SWV317-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:21:07 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.46/0.64  Running first-order model finding
% 0.46/0.64  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JWVmgtCtRj/E---3.1_12848.p
% 0.47/0.77  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.47/0.77  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.77  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # new_bool_3 with pid 12928 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.47/0.77  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.77  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.77  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.77  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12931 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.47/0.77  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.77  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.77  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.77  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.77  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.47/0.77  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.47/0.77  
% 0.47/0.77  # Proof found!
% 0.47/0.77  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.77  # Parsed axioms                        : 2945
% 0.47/0.77  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2348
% 0.47/0.77  # Initial clauses                      : 597
% 0.47/0.77  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 597
% 0.47/0.77  # Processed clauses                    : 631
% 0.47/0.77  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.47/0.77  # ...subsumed                          : 59
% 0.47/0.77  # ...remaining for further processing  : 559
% 0.47/0.77  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.47/0.77  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.47/0.77  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.47/0.77  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.47/0.77  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.47/0.77  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.47/0.77  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Total rewrite steps                  : 49
% 0.47/0.77  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.47/0.77  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.47/0.77  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.47/0.77  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.47/0.77  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.47/0.77  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 0.47/0.77  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.47/0.77  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.47/0.77  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.47/0.77  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.47/0.77  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 487
% 0.47/0.77  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1088
% 0.47/0.77  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Current number of archived clauses   : 527
% 0.47/0.77  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46736
% 0.47/0.77  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20265
% 0.47/0.77  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 37
% 0.47/0.77  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1030
% 0.47/0.77  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 36
% 0.47/0.77  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.47/0.77  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.47/0.77  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 36382
% 0.47/0.77  
% 0.47/0.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.77  # User time                : 0.052 s
% 0.47/0.77  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.47/0.77  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.47/0.77  # Maximum resident set size: 4648 pages
% 0.47/0.77  
% 0.47/0.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.77  # User time                : 0.105 s
% 0.47/0.77  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.47/0.77  # Total time               : 0.121 s
% 0.47/0.77  # Maximum resident set size: 3620 pages
% 0.47/0.77  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------