TSTP Solution File: SWV313-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV313-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV313-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 06:01:47 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.53 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.16/0.57 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.57 % Transform :cnf
% 0.16/0.57 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.16/0.57 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.57 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 % File : SWV313-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.16/0.57 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.16/0.57 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 0.16/0.57 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.16/0.57 % English :
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.57 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.16/0.57 % Names :
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.57 % Rating : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.16/0.57 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 8 RR)
% 0.16/0.57 % Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% 0.16/0.57 % Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.57 % Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% 0.16/0.57 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.16/0.57 % Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.16/0.57 % Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.16/0.57 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.16/0.57 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.16/0.57 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.16/0.57 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.16/0.57 % axioms.
% 0.16/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.57 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.57 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.57 ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.57 ~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.57 c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.57 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.57 ( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.16/0.57 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 cnf(cls_OtwayRees_Osecrecy__lemma__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.57 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
% 0.16/0.57 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,V_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.16/0.57 | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.16/0.57 | c_in(V_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.16/0.57 | c_in(V_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.16/0.57 | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ) ).
% 0.16/0.57
% 0.16/0.57 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.16/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.58 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.16/0.58 %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.16/0.58 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.16/0.58 %MaxfuncDepth:6
% 0.16/0.58 %SharedTerms:33
% 0.16/0.58 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6
% 0.16/0.58 %singleGoalClaCount:6
% 0.16/0.58 [4]~P1(a20,a7,a19)
% 0.16/0.58 [5]~P1(a21,a7,a19)
% 0.16/0.58 [1]P1(a1,a2,f16(a14))
% 0.16/0.58 [2]P1(f3(a17),f5(a4,a1),a18)
% 0.16/0.58 [6]~P1(f8(a4,f13(a22,f13(a23,f3(a17)))),f10(a1,a14),a14)
% 0.16/0.58 [3]P1(f6(a9,a20,f13(a22,f13(f11(f15(a21),f13(a22,f3(a17))),f11(f15(a20),f13(a23,f3(a17)))))),f10(a1,a14),a14)
% 0.16/0.58 [7]~P1(x71,x72,a18)+P1(x71,f12(x72),a18)
% 0.16/0.58 [8]P1(x81,a7,a19)+P1(x82,a7,a19)+~P1(x86,a2,f16(a14))+~P1(f3(x85),f12(f5(a4,x86)),a18)+P1(f8(a4,f13(x83,f13(x84,f3(x85)))),f10(x86,a14),a14)+~P1(f6(a9,x82,f13(x83,f13(f11(f15(x81),f13(x83,f3(x85))),f11(f15(x82),f13(x84,f3(x85)))))),f10(x86,a14),a14)
% 0.16/0.58 %EqnAxiom
% 0.16/0.58
% 0.16/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.58 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.16/0.58 ($false),
% 0.16/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,2,6,3,8,7]),
% 0.16/0.58 ['proof']).
% 0.16/0.58 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.58 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------