TSTP Solution File: SWV312-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV312-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:56:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4zxVEnIhkI/E---3.1_21248.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4zxVEnIhkI/E---3.1_21248.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4zxVEnIhkI/E---3.1_21248.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : SWV312-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:35:59 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4zxVEnIhkI/E---3.1_21248.p
% 0.15/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # new_bool_1 with pid 21327 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 70s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 21330 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 70s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.52
% 0.15/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 1484
% 0.15/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1318
% 0.15/0.52 # Initial clauses : 166
% 0.15/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 166
% 0.15/0.52 # Processed clauses : 47
% 0.15/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.15/0.52 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.15/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.15/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 34
% 0.15/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 0.15/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 119
% 0.15/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 245
% 0.15/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.15/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.15/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 76
% 0.15/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10304
% 0.15/0.52
% 0.15/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.52 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.52 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 3092 pages
% 0.15/0.52
% 0.15/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.52 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.52 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.52 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.15/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2500 pages
% 0.15/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------