TSTP Solution File: SWV309-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV309-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV309-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 07:08:00 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % File : SWV309-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.21/0.60 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.21/0.60 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 0.21/0.60 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.21/0.60 % English :
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.60 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.21/0.60 % Names :
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.21/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 3 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of literals : 4 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% 0.21/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.21/0.60 % Number of variables : 1 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.21/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.21/0.60 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.21/0.60 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.21/0.60 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.21/0.60 % axioms.
% 0.21/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.60 ( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.21/0.60 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ) ).
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.60 %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.60 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.21/0.60 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.21/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:10
% 0.21/0.60 %SharedTerms:34
% 0.21/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.21/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.56/0.60 [1]P1(f2(a1,a4,f10(a12,f10(f8(f6(a5),f10(a12,f7(a13))),f8(f6(a4),f10(a14,f7(a13)))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)
% 0.56/0.60 [2]~P1(f2(a4,a1,f10(a12,f10(f9(a5),f10(f9(a4),f10(x21,f8(f6(a4),f10(a12,f10(a14,f10(f9(a5),f9(a4)))))))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)
% 0.56/0.60 [3]~P1(f2(a1,a4,f10(a12,f10(f8(f6(a5),f10(a12,f7(a13))),f8(f6(a4),f10(a14,f7(a13)))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)+P1(f2(a4,a1,f10(a12,f10(f9(a5),f10(f9(a4),f10(a16,f8(f6(a4),f10(a12,f10(a14,f10(f9(a5),f9(a4)))))))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)
% 0.56/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.60
% 0.56/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61 cnf(4,plain,
% 0.56/0.61 ($false),
% 0.56/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3]),
% 0.56/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------