TSTP Solution File: SWV307-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
sPE(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
sPE(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
sPE(c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ sPE(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))
| ~ sPE(c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2))
| ~ sPE(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 16:33:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % symbols: 18
% 0.13/0.35 % clauses: 18
% 0.13/0.35 % start clauses: 3
% 0.13/0.35 % iterative deepening steps: 31
% 0.13/0.35 % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.13/0.35 % literal attempts: 2960
% 0.13/0.35 % depth failures: 1850
% 0.13/0.35 % regularity failures: 6
% 0.13/0.35 % tautology failures: 53
% 0.13/0.35 % reductions: 869
% 0.13/0.35 % extensions: 2061
% 0.13/0.35 % SAT variables: 2440
% 0.13/0.35 % SAT clauses: 2027
% 0.13/0.35 % WalkSAT solutions: 2021
% 0.13/0.35 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------