%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SWV307-2 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1791/SWV/SWV307-2+eq_r.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: heq
% detected subclass: small
% detected subclass: short
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (binary-unit-uniteq 30 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 120 #f 5 3)
% (binary-posweight-order 240 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 60 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 12 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 24 #f)
% (hyper 30 #f)
% (binary 24 #t)
% (binary-order 30 #f)
% (binary-unit 30 #f)
% 
% 
% **** EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED ****
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(7,40,0,14,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 9 [] -c_in(X,c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,Y)),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(X,c_^event_^oused(Y),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 10 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,Y),c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(X,c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 11 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(X,Y),c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(Y,c_^message_^oparts(Z),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 12 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^nonce(v_^n^b),c_^event_^oused(v_evs2),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 13 [] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b)))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs2)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 14 [] equal(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^nonce(v_^n^b)).
% 18 [binary:13,11] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs2)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 20 [binary:12,9.2,demod:14] -c_in(v_^n^a,c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs2)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 23 [binary:10.2,20,slowcut:18] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using binary resolution
% not using sos strategy
% using unit paramodulation strategy
% using unit strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% seconds given: 30
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    9
%  derived clauses:   11
%  kept clauses:      4
%  kept size sum:     39
%  kept mid-nuclei:   0
%  kept new demods:   1
%  forw unit-subs:    3
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  0
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime  :  0.1
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP1791/SWV/SWV307-2+eq_r.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------