TSTP Solution File: SWV307-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 07:24:58 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of literals : 9 ( 1 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.19/0.61 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.19/0.61 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.19/0.61 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.19/0.61 % axioms.
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.19/0.61 | c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.19/0.61 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.19/0.61 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.61 %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:17)
% 0.19/0.61 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.19/0.61 %SharedTerms:20
% 0.19/0.61 %goalClause: 18 19 20
% 0.19/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.19/0.61 [18]E(f2(a1),a9)
% 0.19/0.61 [20]~P1(f2(a1),f6(a15),a13)
% 0.19/0.61 [19]P1(f8(f11(a10),f7(a9,f7(f3(a10),f3(a14)))),f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)
% 0.19/0.61 [23]P1(x231,f6(x232),a13)+~P1(x231,f12(f5(a4,x232)),a13)
% 0.19/0.61 [21]P1(x211,f12(x212),a13)+~P1(f8(x213,x211),f12(x212),a13)
% 0.19/0.61 [22]P1(x221,f12(x222),a13)+~P1(f7(x221,x223),f12(x222),a13)
% 0.19/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.61 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.19/0.61 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.19/0.61 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.19/0.61 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.19/0.61 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f11(x51),f11(x52))
% 0.19/0.61 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61),f3(x62))
% 0.19/0.61 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71,x73),f5(x72,x73))
% 0.19/0.61 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x83,x81),f5(x83,x82))
% 0.19/0.61 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f7(x91,x93),f7(x92,x93))
% 0.19/0.61 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f7(x103,x101),f7(x103,x102))
% 0.19/0.61 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f12(x111),f12(x112))
% 0.19/0.61 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f8(x121,x123),f8(x122,x123))
% 0.19/0.61 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f8(x133,x131),f8(x133,x132))
% 0.19/0.61 [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f6(x141),f6(x142))
% 0.19/0.61 [15]P1(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P1(x151,x153,x154)
% 0.19/0.61 [16]P1(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x161,x164)
% 0.19/0.61 [17]P1(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174,x171)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(24,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (E(a9,f2(a1))),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,2])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (E(f8(x301,f2(a1)),f8(x301,a9))),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,19,2,23,15,3,14,13])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(31,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (E(f8(f2(a1),x311),f8(a9,x311))),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,19,2,23,15,3,14,13,12])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P1(f7(a9,f7(f3(a10),f3(a14))),f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,19,2,23,15,3,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,21])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P1(a9,f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,19,2,23,15,3,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,21,17,22])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(47,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P1(f2(a1),f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,23])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(49,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P1(f8(x491,f2(a1)),f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,23,21])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(64,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (E(f8(x641,f2(a1)),f8(x641,a9))),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(rename_variables,[],[30])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(67,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,30,64,31,49,40,47,43,23,22,3,2,15]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------