TSTP Solution File: SWV307-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV307-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:34:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (   2 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Public_OMPair__used_1,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Public_OMPair__used_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_4 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OMPair__used_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
    cls_conjecture_6 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV307-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 06:53:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # new_bool_3 with pid 24034 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 24037 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Result found by 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 1481
% 0.20/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1328
% 0.20/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 153
% 0.20/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 153
% 0.20/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 284
% 0.20/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.20/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 24
% 0.20/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 259
% 0.20/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.20/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 108
% 0.20/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 54
% 0.20/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 87
% 0.20/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 21
% 0.20/0.54  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 28
% 0.20/0.54  # ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.20/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 126
% 0.20/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 45
% 0.20/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 23
% 0.20/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 58
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54
% 0.20/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 115
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 133
% 0.20/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3544
% 0.20/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3226
% 0.20/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.20/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 322
% 0.20/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 28
% 0.20/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.20/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 12966
% 0.20/0.54  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2855
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.54  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 3052 pages
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  # User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.20/0.54  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Total time               : 0.051 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 2500 pages
% 0.20/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------