TSTP Solution File: SWV302-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV302-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWV302-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:06:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Tue Jun 14 18:06:07 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24156.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [copy,10,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.20/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.20/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.20/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.20/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 88
% 0.20/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 25
% 0.20/0.37 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.20/0.37 distinct function count: 11
% 0.20/0.37 distinct constant count: 12
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.01 sec ----> 19 [binary,18.1,3.1] {+} $F.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 1 [] {+} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.20/0.37 4 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 5 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 6 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 7 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|v_NB=c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa).
% 0.20/0.37 8 [copy,7,flip.2] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa)=v_NB.
% 0.20/0.37 9 [] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 11 [para_from,8.2.1,2.1.1] {-} -c_in(v_NB,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.20/0.37 12 [hyper,9,6] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 14 [hyper,12,5] {-} c_in(v_NB,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 16 [hyper,14,4] {+} c_in(v_NB,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.20/0.37 17 [hyper,16,11] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.20/0.37 18 [hyper,17,1,9] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.20/0.37 19 [binary,18.1,3.1] {+} $F.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.37 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 true clauses given 3 (30.0%)
% 0.20/0.37 false clauses given 7
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 FALSE TRUE
% 0.20/0.37 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 Process 24156 finished Tue Jun 14 18:06:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------