TSTP Solution File: SWV302-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV302-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 10 unt; 1 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 2 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_13,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| v_NB = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_13) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_16,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_16) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,Y)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Event_Oused(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(9,plain,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_16,cls_conjecture_5,cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(10,plain,
v_NB = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_13,9]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
~ c_in(v_NB,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2,10,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(12,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
~ c_in(v_NB,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,11]) ).
cnf(15,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,13]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[12,15]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SWV302-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.07/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.27 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.07/0.27 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:00:58 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36 *
% 0.11/0.36 *
% 0.11/0.37 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.11/0.37 *
% 0.11/0.37 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.11/0.37 *
% 0.11/0.37 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.11/0.37 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.11/0.37 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.11/0.37 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.11/0.37 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.11/0.37 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.11/0.37 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.11/0.37 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.11/0.37 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.11/0.37 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.11/0.37 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.11/0.37 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.11/0.37 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.11/0.37 *
% 0.11/0.37 "."
% 0.11/0.37 *
% 0.11/0.37 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T18:00:58
% 0.11/0.37 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T18:00:58
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 #||
% 0.11/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.39 ||#
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.11/0.39 ; 20 formulas have been input or derived (from 10 formulas).
% 0.11/0.39 ; 16 (80%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.11/0.39 ; 4 (25%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.11/0.39 ; 12 (75%) are still being kept.
% 0.11/0.39 ;
% 0.11/0.39 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.002 9% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Assert (8 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.003 14% Process new row (17 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.001 5% Resolution (18 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (9 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (5 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (5 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (5 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (17 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (16 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (5 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.001 5% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.015 68% Other
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.022 Total
% 0.11/0.39 ; 0.022 Real time
% 0.11/0.39 ;
% 0.11/0.39 ; Term-hash-array has 55 terms in all.
% 0.11/0.39 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3 entries (4 at peak, 5 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.11/0.39 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 17 nodes (115 at peak, 131 added, 114 deleted).
% 0.11/0.39 ; Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 5 calls.
% 0.11/0.39 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 5 calls.
% 0.11/0.39 ; Path-index has 58 entries (61 at peak, 82 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.11/0.39 ; Path-index has 400 nodes (405 at peak, 447 added, 47 deleted).
% 0.11/0.39 ; Trie-index has 58 entries (61 at peak, 82 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.11/0.39 ; Trie-index has 331 nodes (399 at peak, 591 added, 260 deleted).
% 0.11/0.39 ; Retrieved 1 generalization term in 15 calls.
% 0.11/0.39 ; Retrieved 12 instance terms in 10 calls.
% 0.11/0.39 ; Retrieved 53 unifiable terms in 104 calls.
% 0.11/0.39 ;
% 0.11/0.39 ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.11/0.39 ; 1 with value 14
% 0.11/0.39 ; The agenda of rows to give has 2 entries:
% 0.11/0.39 ; 1 with value (4 14) 1 with value (4 16)
% 0.11/0.39 Evaluation took:
% 0.11/0.39 0.023 seconds of real time
% 0.11/0.39 0.022831 seconds of user run time
% 0.11/0.39 1.47e-4 seconds of system run time
% 0.11/0.39 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.11/0.39 0 page faults and
% 0.11/0.39 3,185,744 bytes consed.
% 0.11/0.39 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.11/0.39 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T18:00:58
% 0.11/0.39 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.11/0.39 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------