TSTP Solution File: SWV302-2 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV302-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:28:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ( sPE(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_13)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_16)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    sPE(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    sPE(c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( ~ sPE(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))
    | ~ sPE(c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2))
    | ~ sPE(tc_Message_Omsg,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_NB,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_NB,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_NB,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0)]) ).

cnf(g10,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_NB,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV302-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:05:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  % symbols: 26
% 0.12/0.36  % clauses: 23
% 0.12/0.36  % start clauses: 5
% 0.12/0.36  % iterative deepening steps: 50
% 0.12/0.36  % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.12/0.36  % literal attempts: 16396
% 0.12/0.36  % depth failures: 9070
% 0.12/0.36  % regularity failures: 17
% 0.12/0.36  % tautology failures: 167
% 0.12/0.36  % reductions: 6365
% 0.12/0.36  % extensions: 9864
% 0.12/0.36  % SAT variables: 6354
% 0.12/0.36  % SAT clauses: 5469
% 0.12/0.36  % WalkSAT solutions: 5467
% 0.12/0.36  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------