TSTP Solution File: SWV301-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SWV301-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 54.8s
% Output   : Assurance 54.8s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10687/SWV/SWV301-1+eq_r.in
% 
% Some predicates or functions were curried and renamed.
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 28 #f 11 9)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 11 9)
% (binary-double 11 #f 11 9)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 11 9)
% (binary-order 28 #f 11 9)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(1485,40,7,2970,0,14,298425,4,2134,299562,5,2815,299563,5,2821,299564,1,2821,299564,50,2827,299564,40,2827,301049,0,2829,352352,3,4230,370077,4,4930,373022,5,5631,373023,1,5635,373023,50,5642,373023,40,5642,374508,0,5643)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 373026 [] c_in(X,c_union(c_^message_^osynth(c_^message_^oanalz(Y)),c_^message_^oparts(Y),tc_^message_^omsg),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(X,c_^message_^oparts(c_insert(Z,Y,tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(Z,c_^message_^osynth(c_^message_^oanalz(Y)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 373028 [] -c_in(X,c_^message_^oanalz(Y),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(X,c_^message_^oparts(Y),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 373031 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(c_^public_^oshr^k(X)),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,Y)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(Y,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 373062 [] c_in(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 373077 [] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(X,Y),c_^message_^osynth(Z),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(X,Y),Z,tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X),Z,tc_^message_^omsg).
% 373308 [] -c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U) | c_in(X,Z,U) | c_in(X,Y,U).
% 374500 [] -c_in(v_^b,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 374501 [] c_in(v_evsf,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)).
% 374502 [] c_in(v_^x,c_^message_^osynth(c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf))),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 374503 [] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^oparts(c_insert(v_^x,c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf),tc_^message_^omsg)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 374504 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evsf,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 374505 [] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(v_^b,c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_x,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b)))))))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evsf,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | equal(v_^b,c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy).
% 374508 [?] ?
% 374532 [input:374508,cut:374504] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(v_^b,c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b)))))))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evsf,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 374534 [binary:374505,374532.2] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg) | equal(v_^b,c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy).
% 374551 [binary:374503,373026.2,cut:374502] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_union(c_^message_^osynth(c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 374583 [binary:374501,373031.2] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(c_^public_^oshr^k(X)),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 374600 [binary:374500,374583.2] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b)),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 374615 [binary:373028.2,374600] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b)),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 374782 [para:374534.2.2,373062.1.1,cut:374500] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^oparts(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 375231 [binary:373028.2,374782] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 375372 [binary:373077.2,375231,cut:374615] -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^osynth(c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evsf))),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 391985 [binary:374551,373308,cut:374782,cut:375372] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using binary resolution
% not using sos strategy
% using double strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% clause length limited to 9
% clause depth limited to 11
% seconds given: 11
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    6294
%  derived clauses:   460884
%  kept clauses:      161191
%  kept size sum:     231331
%  kept mid-nuclei:   13269
%  kept new demods:   75
%  forw unit-subs:    64809
%  forw double-subs: 8410
%  forw overdouble-subs: 1697
%  backward subs:     88
%  fast unit cutoff:  1025
%  full unit cutoff:  471
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  2
%  real runtime  :  59.4
%  process. runtime:  58.84
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           17520
%  length fails:    267
%  strength fails:  337
%  predlist fails:  10222
%  aux str. fails:  21
%  by-lit fails:    40
%  full subs tried: 6339
%  full subs fail:  4642
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP10687/SWV/SWV301-1+eq_r.in")
% WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 54.83s, total lost is 54.83s
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------