TSTP Solution File: SWV298-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV298-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 18 unt; 1 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 4 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 25 ( 25 usr; 14 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_Aa,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
( X != c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)
| v_B != v_Ba ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X,Y,Z),c_List_Oset(U,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| c_in(Z,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,U)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oanalz(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oanalz(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Message_Oanalz(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_OtwayRees_Ounique__NA__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Z,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(U)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Z,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(Y),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| V = U ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_Ounique__NA__dest_0) ).
cnf(11,plain,
v_B != v_Ba,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(12,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba))))))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(14,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,12]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,14]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,16]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,18]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OtwayRees_Ounique__NA__dest_0,20,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0,11]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),X),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,21]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,23]) ).
cnf(33,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),Y)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,27]) ).
cnf(40,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Y,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),Z))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,33]) ).
cnf(48,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Y,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Z,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba)))),U)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,40]) ).
cnf(49,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[13,48]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV298-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 22:07:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T22:07:39
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T22:07:39
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 #||
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52 ||#
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 66 formulas have been input or derived (from 40 formulas).
% 0.19/0.52 ; 49 (74%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.19/0.52 ; 2 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.52 ; 47 (96%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.52 ;
% 0.19/0.52 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.004 9% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Assert (10 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.008 18% Process new row (51 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.001 2% Resolution (78 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.005 11% Paramodulation (39 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.001 2% Backward subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (51 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.003 7% Backward simplification (49 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.022 50% Other
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.044 Total
% 0.19/0.52 ; 0.048 Real time
% 0.19/0.52 ;
% 0.19/0.52 ; Term-hash-array has 147 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5 entries (6 at peak, 6 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 50 nodes (57 at peak, 57 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Path-index has 159 entries (160 at peak, 161 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Path-index has 1,160 nodes (1,165 at peak, 1,166 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Trie-index has 159 entries (160 at peak, 161 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Trie-index has 1,192 nodes (1,224 at peak, 1,226 added, 34 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 1 generalization term in 53 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 43 instance terms in 42 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ; Retrieved 263 unifiable terms in 705 calls.
% 0.19/0.52 ;
% 0.19/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to give has 8 entries:
% 0.19/0.52 ; 3 with value (4 41) 1 with value (4 44) 4 with value (4 45)
% 0.19/0.52 Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.52 0.049 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.52 0.042879 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.52 0.006149 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.52 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.52 0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.52 4,975,096 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.52 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T22:07:39
% 0.19/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.52 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------