TSTP Solution File: SWV295-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV295-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.51s 0.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : SWV295-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 03:02:16 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.71 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.71 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.51/0.71 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.71 % Transform :cnf
% 0.51/0.71 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.51/0.71 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.51/0.71
% 0.51/0.71 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.51/0.71 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.51/0.71 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 % File : SWV295-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.51/0.72 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.51/0.72 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 0.51/0.72 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.51/0.72 % English :
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.51/0.72 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.51/0.72 % Names :
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.51/0.72 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.51/0.72 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% 0.51/0.72 % Number of literals : 9 ( 1 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.51/0.72 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.51/0.72 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.51/0.72 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.51/0.72 % Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.51/0.72 % Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn)
% 0.51/0.72 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.51/0.72 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.51/0.72 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.51/0.72 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.51/0.72 % axioms.
% 0.51/0.72 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(cls_conjecture_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.51/0.72 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.51/0.72 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.51/0.72 v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) ).
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
% 0.51/0.72 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.51/0.72 | c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.72 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.51/0.72 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.51/0.72 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.51/0.72 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 % Proof found
% 0.51/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.72 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.51/0.72 %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:17)
% 0.51/0.72 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.51/0.72 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.51/0.72 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.51/0.72 %SharedTerms:18
% 0.51/0.72 %goalClause: 18 19 20
% 0.51/0.72 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.51/0.72 [18]E(f2(a1),a9)
% 0.51/0.72 [20]~P1(f2(a1),f7(a15),a13)
% 0.51/0.72 [19]P1(f4(f11(a10),f8(f2(a1),f3(a14))),f12(f6(a5,a15)),a13)
% 0.51/0.72 [23]P1(x231,f7(x232),a13)+~P1(x231,f12(f6(a5,x232)),a13)
% 0.51/0.72 [21]P1(x211,f12(x212),a13)+~P1(f4(x213,x211),f12(x212),a13)
% 0.51/0.72 [22]P1(x221,f12(x222),a13)+~P1(f8(x221,x223),f12(x222),a13)
% 0.51/0.72 %EqnAxiom
% 0.51/0.72 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.51/0.72 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.51/0.72 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.51/0.72 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.51/0.72 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f11(x51),f11(x52))
% 0.51/0.72 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f12(x61),f12(x62))
% 0.51/0.72 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x71),f3(x72))
% 0.51/0.72 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f8(x81,x83),f8(x82,x83))
% 0.51/0.72 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f8(x93,x91),f8(x93,x92))
% 0.51/0.72 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x101,x103),f4(x102,x103))
% 0.51/0.72 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f4(x113,x111),f4(x113,x112))
% 0.51/0.72 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f6(x121,x123),f6(x122,x123))
% 0.51/0.72 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f6(x133,x131),f6(x133,x132))
% 0.51/0.72 [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f7(x141),f7(x142))
% 0.51/0.72 [15]P1(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P1(x151,x153,x154)
% 0.51/0.72 [16]P1(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x161,x164)
% 0.51/0.72 [17]P1(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174,x171)
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.51/0.72 (P1(f2(a1),f12(f6(a5,a15)),a13)),
% 0.51/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,19,2,23,15,3,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,21,17,22])).
% 0.51/0.72 cnf(47,plain,
% 0.51/0.72 ($false),
% 0.51/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,43,23]),
% 0.51/0.72 ['proof']).
% 0.51/0.72 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.51/0.72 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------