TSTP Solution File: SWV291-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV291-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.41s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV291-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 07:31:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Wed Jun 15 07:31:14 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15584.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 9
% 0.18/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 12
% 0.18/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.18/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.18/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 91
% 0.18/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 26
% 0.18/0.41 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.18/0.41 distinct function count: 14
% 0.18/0.41 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.04 sec ----> 21 [binary,20.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 6.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 1 [] {+} -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.18/0.41 2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 0.18/0.41 3 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 4 [copy,3,unit_del,2] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 5 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),C,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(A),C,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 6 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(B,C,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)| -c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 7 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 8 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(B)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.18/0.41 9 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|c_in(A,B,D).
% 0.18/0.41 11 [] {-} c_in(v_evsf,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)).
% 0.18/0.41 12 [] {+} c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 13 [] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 14 [hyper,13,6,12] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 15 [hyper,14,9,unit_del,4] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 16 [hyper,15,5] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 17 [hyper,16,7,unit_del,4] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 19 [hyper,17,7] {+} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.18/0.41 20 [hyper,19,8,11] {-} c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 0.18/0.41 21 [binary,20.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.41 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 ============ end of search ============
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 true clauses given 7 (87.5%)
% 0.18/0.41 false clauses given 1
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 FALSE TRUE
% 0.18/0.41 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Process 15584 finished Wed Jun 15 07:31:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------