TSTP Solution File: SWV291-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV291-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.61s
% Output : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 12 unt; 2 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 25 ( 25 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evsf,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(7,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5,cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X,Y),c_Message_Osynth(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X,Y),Z,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X),Z,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(Y,Z,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(Y,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(Z)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(Z)),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Message_Oanalz(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK__D__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(Y)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK__D__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_union(Y,Z,U),U)
| c_in(X,Z,U)
| c_in(X,Y,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(14,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,7]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK__D__dest_0,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,cls_conjecture_3,cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,16]) ).
cnf(110,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_0,14,22]) ).
cnf(596,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0,110,7]),17]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV291-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 06:51:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 "."
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T06:51:54
% 0.19/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T06:51:54
% 0.37/0.61
% 0.37/0.61
% 0.37/0.61 #||
% 0.37/0.61 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.61 ||#
% 0.37/0.61
% 0.37/0.61 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.61 ; 634 formulas have been input or derived (from 43 formulas).
% 0.37/0.61 ; 596 (94%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.37/0.61 ; 1 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.61 ; 595 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.61 ;
% 0.37/0.61 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.004 3% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.001 1% Assert (11 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.071 54% Process new row (618 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.009 7% Resolution (84 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.003 2% Paramodulation (42 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (5 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (5 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (5 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.011 8% Forward simplification (618 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.005 4% Backward simplification (595 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.027 21% Other
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.131 Total
% 0.37/0.61 ; 0.133 Real time
% 0.37/0.61 ;
% 0.37/0.61 ; Term-hash-array has 1,213 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.61 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5 entries (5 at peak, 5 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.61 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 52 nodes (52 at peak, 52 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.61 ; Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 5 calls.
% 0.37/0.61 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 5 calls.
% 0.37/0.61 ; Path-index has 1,224 entries (1,224 at peak, 1,224 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.61 ; Path-index has 1,008 nodes (1,008 at peak, 1,008 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.61 ; Trie-index has 1,224 entries (1,224 at peak, 1,224 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.61 ; Trie-index has 10,022 nodes (10,022 at peak, 10,022 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.61 ; Retrieved 25 generalization terms in 627 calls.
% 0.37/0.61 ; Retrieved 589 instance terms in 589 calls.
% 0.37/0.61 ; Retrieved 8,514 unifiable terms in 601 calls.
% 0.37/0.61 ;
% 0.37/0.61 ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 0.37/0.61 ; 1 with value 32 4 with value 33
% 0.37/0.61 ; The agenda of rows to give has 552 entries:
% 0.37/0.61 ; 6 with value (4 26) 4 with value (4 32) 60 with value (4 37)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 21 with value (4 28) 16 with value (4 33) 80 with value (4 39)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 12 with value (4 29) 48 with value (4 34) 36 with value (4 40)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 28 with value (4 30) 1 with value (4 35) 1 with value (4 41)
% 0.37/0.61 ; 32 with value (4 31) 47 with value (4 36) 160 with value (4 42)
% 0.37/0.61 Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.61 0.134 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.61 0.115701 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.61 0.018197 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.61 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.61 0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.61 10,046,504 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.61 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.61 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T06:51:54
% 0.37/0.61 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.61 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------