TSTP Solution File: SWV289-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV289-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:32:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWV289-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 09:08:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File : SWV289-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.20/0.62 % Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 0.20/0.62 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.20/0.62 % English :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.62 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.20/0.62 % Names :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.63 % Rating : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.38 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.29 v6.2.0, 0.11 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0, 0.12 v4.0.1, 0.20 v4.0.0, 0.29 v3.4.0, 0.25 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.20/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 9 RR)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% 0.20/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of functors : 27 ( 27 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of variables : 14 ( 2 sgn)
% 0.20/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.20/0.63 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.20/0.63 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.20/0.63 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.20/0.63 % axioms.
% 0.20/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X_H,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 ~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_OtwayRees_OB__trusts__OR3__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
% 0.20/0.63 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(V_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.20/0.63 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(V_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X_H,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.20/0.63 | c_in(V_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.20/0.63 | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,V_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__not__see__encrypted__key__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
% 0.20/0.63 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,V_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.20/0.63 | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.20/0.63 | c_in(V_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.20/0.63 | c_in(V_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.20/0.63 | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.63 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.63 %VarNum:47(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.20/0.63 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.20/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:10
% 0.20/0.63 %SharedTerms:46
% 0.20/0.63 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% 0.20/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:7
% 0.20/0.63 [5]~P1(a22,a7,a21)
% 0.20/0.63 [6]~P1(a23,a7,a21)
% 0.20/0.63 [1]P1(a1,a2,f18(a16))
% 0.20/0.63 [2]P1(f3(a19),f12(f5(a4,a1)),a20)
% 0.20/0.63 [7]~P1(f9(a4,f15(a24,f15(a26,f3(a19)))),f10(a1,a16),a16)
% 0.20/0.63 [3]P1(f6(a22,f15(a24,f15(a25,f13(f17(a22),f15(a26,f3(a19)))))),f10(a1,a16),a16)
% 0.20/0.63 [4]P1(f8(a22,a11,f15(a24,f15(f14(a23),f15(f14(a22),f15(a27,f13(f17(a22),f15(a24,f15(a26,f15(f14(a23),f14(a22)))))))))),f10(a1,a16),a16)
% 0.20/0.63 [9]P1(x91,a7,a21)+~P1(x96,a2,f18(a16))+~P1(f6(x91,f15(x92,f15(x97,f13(f17(x91),f15(x95,f3(x94)))))),f10(x96,a16),a16)+P1(f8(a11,x91,f15(x92,f15(f13(f17(x93),f15(x92,f3(x94))),f13(f17(x91),f15(x95,f3(x94)))))),f10(x96,a16),a16)+~P1(f8(x91,a11,f15(x92,f15(f14(x93),f15(f14(x91),f15(x98,f13(f17(x91),f15(x92,f15(x95,f15(f14(x93),f14(x91)))))))))),f10(x96,a16),a16)
% 0.20/0.63 [8]P1(x81,a7,a21)+P1(x82,a7,a21)+~P1(x86,a2,f18(a16))+~P1(f3(x85),f12(f5(a4,x86)),a20)+P1(f9(a4,f15(x83,f15(x84,f3(x85)))),f10(x86,a16),a16)+~P1(f8(a11,x82,f15(x83,f15(f13(f17(x81),f15(x83,f3(x85))),f13(f17(x82),f15(x84,f3(x85)))))),f10(x86,a16),a16)
% 0.20/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 ($false),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,6,2,7,3,4,9,8]),
% 0.20/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------