TSTP Solution File: SWV289-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : SWV289-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory : 1003MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 84.8s
% Output : Assurance 84.8s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP333/SWV/SWV289-1+eq_r.in
%
% Some predicates or functions were curried and renamed.
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: neq
% detected subclass: big
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 28 #f 11 11)
% (binary-unit 28 #f 11 11)
% (binary-double 11 #f 11 11)
% (binary-double 17 #f)
% (binary-double 17 #t)
% (binary 87 #t 11 11)
% (binary-order 28 #f 11 11)
% (binary-posweight-order 58 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-big-order 28 #f)
% (binary-posweight-lex-small-order 11 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 28 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 28 #f)
% (binary-weightorder-sos 17 #f)
% (binary-order 28 #f)
% (hyper-order 17 #f)
% (binary 141 #t)
%
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(1485,40,8,2970,0,13,261008,4,2132,261885,5,2814,261886,5,2819,261887,1,2819,261887,50,2827,261887,40,2827,263372,0,2829,313026,3,4230,332201,4,4930,335178,5,5630,335179,5,5634,335180,1,5634,335180,50,5640,335180,40,5640,336665,0,5641,362716,3,6193,373630,4,6467,376087,5,6742,376088,5,6743,376089,1,6743,376089,50,6745,376089,40,6745,377574,0,6747,409514,3,7598,426587,4,8023,429563,5,8448,429564,5,8449,429565,1,8449,429565,50,8453,429565,40,8453,431050,0,8455)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 431039 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(X,c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(Z),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(U,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(Z),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(X)))))))))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(Z),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X1))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X1)))))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^gets(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X2,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X1)))))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(W,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 431041 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(Z),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U)))))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^notes(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(V,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U)))),c_^list_^oset(W,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(U),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,W)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(W,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(Z,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 431044 [] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(v_^b,c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x_^h,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^agent(v_^b)))))))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 431045 [] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^gets(v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^x,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 431046 [] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^notes(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 431047 [] -c_in(v_^a,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 431048 [] -c_in(v_^b,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 431049 [] c_in(v_evs,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)).
% 431050 [] c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,v_evs)),tc_^message_^omsg).
% 431088 [binary:431041.6,431048] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(Y),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(U,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z)))))),c_^list_^oset(V,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^notes(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(X,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(U,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z)))),c_^list_^oset(V,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(Z),c_^message_^oanalz(c_^event_^oknows(c_^message_^oagent_^o^spy,V)),tc_^message_^omsg) | -c_in(V,c_^otway^rees_^ootway,tc_^list_^olist(tc_^event_^oevent)) | c_in(Y,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 431169 [binary:431039,431044,cut:431049,cut:431048] c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^a),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^gets(v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(Y,c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(X)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent).
% 435288 [binary:431046,431088.2,cut:431050,cut:431049] -c_in(c_^event_^oevent_^o^says(c_^message_^oagent_^o^server,v_^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(X),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^a,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k))),c_^message_^omsg_^o^crypt(c_^public_^oshr^k(v_^b),c_^message_^omsg_^o^m^pair(v_^n^b,c_^message_^omsg_^o^key(v_^k)))))),c_^list_^oset(v_evs,tc_^event_^oevent),tc_^event_^oevent) | c_in(X,c_^event_^obad,tc_^message_^oagent).
% 446303 [binary:431045,431169.2,binarydemod:435288,cut:431047] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using binary resolution
% using sos strategy
% using double strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% using clause demodulation
% seconds given: 17
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 9691
% derived clauses: 546205
% kept clauses: 240930
% kept size sum: 376236
% kept mid-nuclei: 18914
% kept new demods: 139
% forw unit-subs: 81025
% forw double-subs: 23697
% forw overdouble-subs: 4329
% backward subs: 74
% fast unit cutoff: 2134
% full unit cutoff: 994
% dbl unit cutoff: 4
% real runtime : 89.47
% process. runtime: 89.24
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 104694
% length fails: 4494
% strength fails: 10568
% predlist fails: 25850
% aux str. fails: 3829
% by-lit fails: 4735
% full subs tried: 46363
% full subs fail: 42028
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP333/SWV/SWV289-1+eq_r.in")
% WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 84.83s, total lost is 84.83s
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------